October 18, 2026

Editor

Daily Thinkers is a digital news and analysis platform dedicated to thoughtful journalism and informed perspectives on global affairs. We cover diplomacy, real-estate, investment, economics, sports, governance, international relations, policy, development, and social issues with a strong emphasis on context, constructive, and credibility. In a fast-paced media environment, Daily Thinkers focuses on insight rather than immediacy, offering readers analysis that explains not only what is happening, but why it matters. Our content is designed for a global audience that values clarity, reasoned debate, and responsible reporting. With contributors drawn from journalism, academia, public policy, think tankers and diplomacy. Daily Thinkers serves as a bridge between information and understanding, particularly highlighting Africa’s evolving role within global conversations.

The Public Diplomacy Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has bid farewell to Mr. Stilson Muhwezi, First Secretary, as he prepares to take up his new Tour of Duty at the Uganda Consulate in Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China.

The farewell gathering, held in Kampala, brought together colleagues from the Department to recognise Mr. Muhwezi’s contribution to public diplomacy, strategic communication and the broader work of the Ministry during his time in the Department.

Reflecting on his experience, Mr. Muhwezi expressed appreciation to his colleagues for their support, professional cooperation and teamwork throughout his service, particularly during demanding periods. He highlighted the lessons gained through his work in public diplomacy and expressed readiness to apply this experience to his new assignment in China. He also acknowledged the contribution of colleagues in delivering key departmental assignments, including the Diplomatic Notes Newsletter, noting that maintaining professional standards and delivering quality communication products requires collective commitment, coordination and teamwork.

Mrs. Anne Babinaga the Head of the Public Diplomacy Department,  commended Mr. Muhwezi for his contribution to the Department and encouraged him to carry forward the experience gained into his new assignment. Mrs. Babinaga emphasised that public diplomacy brings together several dimensions of international engagement, including strategic communication, cultural relations, economic and commercial diplomacy, and broader people-to-people relations. “The experience you have gained here is a strong foundation for your next assignment. The ability to bring different aspects of diplomacy together is an important skill that will continue to serve you wherever you are posted,” Mrs. Babinaga noted.

Colleagues also recognised Mr. Muhwezi’s commitment to teamwork, professional learning and the delivery of departmental assignments. They encouraged him to build on the knowledge and experience gained in the Public Diplomacy Department as he begins his new chapter in Guangzhou. His posting comes at a time when Uganda and China continue to strengthen bilateral relations across diplomatic, economic, commercial, cultural and people-to-people engagements.

As he embarks on his new Tour of Duty, the Public Diplomacy Department wished Mr. Muhwezi success and fulfilment in his assignment and expressed appreciation for his service, professionalism and contribution to the Department.

Kayunga, Uganda – 27 September 2026 — Two people have been killed and nine others injured following a road crash along the Kayunga–Jinja road, once again drawing attention to the human cost of road traffic crashes in Uganda and the wider road-safety challenge facing Africa.

The crash occurred at Seeta Nyize in Kangulumira Town Council, Kayunga District, when a Toyota Hiace taxi, registration number UAW 058J, reportedly collided with the rear of a Tata lorry, registration number UBR 835Y. According to Ssezibwa Region Police spokesperson SP Hellen Butoto, both vehicles were travelling from Kayunga towards Jinja when the collision occurred.

Two occupants Martin Mubiru and Fred Wanguwu, both residents of Nazigo in Kayunga District died in the crash. Nine people were injured, including Reagan Genga, Moses Kiiza, Jackson Ojambo, David Ibeli, Rukia Amoit, Manjeri Erumbi, Julius Kasubi and an unidentified baby, according to police information cited in the incident report.

The injured were taken to Kangulumira Health Centre IV, while one critically injured victim was transferred to Kayunga Regional Referral Hospital for further treatment. Police said the driver of the Toyota Hiace was among those killed, while the driver of the Tata lorry reportedly fled the scene and is being sought. The two vehicles were towed to Kangulumira Police Station for inspection as investigations continue.

Uganda’s Road Safety Challenge

The Kayunga crash is one incident within a much larger national road-safety challenge. According to the Uganda Police Force Annual Crime Report 2024, Uganda recorded 25,107 road traffic crashes in 2024, up from 23,608 in 2023—an increase of 6.4 percent. Of the crashes recorded in 2024, 4,434 were classified as fatal, 13,134 as serious and 7,539 as minor. Fatal crashes alone increased by 6.1 percent, from 4,179 in 2023 to 4,434 in 2024.

The figures show that Uganda’s road-safety challenge is not limited to isolated high-profile crashes. The number of reported crashes has been increasing, with the Police data showing a continuing burden of fatal and serious collisions.Uganda Police has previously noted that the burden of road traffic deaths falls heavily on pedestrians, boda boda riders and passengers, highlighting the particular vulnerability of people who have less physical protection in road crashes.

The issue extends well beyond Uganda, the World Health Organization estimates that approximately 1.19 million people die globally every year from road traffic crashes. Road traffic injuries are also identified as the leading cause of death among children and young people aged 5–29 years. More than half of road traffic fatalities globally occur among pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists.

The burden is particularly significant in low- and middle-income countries, where road users can face a combination of rapidly expanding vehicle fleets, vulnerable road users, infrastructure constraints and limited emergency-response capacity. WHO’s 2023 Global Status Report on Road Safety therefore places road safety within a broader public-health and development agenda.

For Uganda, WHO’s country data recorded a road traffic mortality rate of 16 deaths per 100,000 population in 2021, although WHO cautions that country-level mortality estimates have limitations where vital registration systems are incomplete.

The Kayunga incident also illustrates why road safety must be understood as more than a policing issue. A serious road crash affects families, health facilities, businesses, transport operators and local economies. A single collision can result in loss of household income, medical costs, permanent disability and long-term social consequences. This makes road safety relevant to Uganda’s wider development agenda, including public health, transport planning, urbanisation, emergency services, enforcement and economic productivity. For rapidly growing district centres and transport corridors such as Kayunga–Jinja, the challenge is particularly important as commercial activity and passenger movement increase.

Police investigations into the Kayunga crash will be expected to establish the circumstances surrounding the collision, including the factors that contributed to the vehicles colliding. The immediate priority remains supporting the injured, assisting affected families and establishing the facts. The broader lesson, however, is equally important: every road death represents more than a statistic.

Uganda’s official data show that thousands of road crashes are recorded every year, while the WHO’s global evidence demonstrates that road traffic injuries remain a major preventable cause of death among young people. Improving road safety therefore requires a shared effort involving drivers, passengers, pedestrians, transport operators, enforcement agencies, road authorities, health services and communities.

The objective is not simply to respond after a crash. It is to build a transport system in which reaching one’s destination does not carry an unacceptable risk to life. From Kayunga to the wider African road network, road safety is ultimately a question of protecting people and protecting the continent’s human capital.

 

Hoima, Uganda — Kabalega International Airport has begun receiving passenger flights, marking an important step in Uganda’s efforts to connect the oil-producing region more directly with the rest of Uganda and the wider African economy.

The arrival of a Uganda Airlines Bombardier CRJ900 carrying CAF, FIFA and AFCON Local Organising Committee officials provides a particularly powerful symbol of what the airport is being positioned to support: energy, sport, tourism, trade and regional mobility converging around Hoima.

The development comes as Uganda prepares for two major milestones—its first oil production and the co-hosting of the 2027 Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) with Kenya and Tanzania. AFCON 2027 is scheduled to begin on 19 June 2027, bringing one of Africa’s biggest sporting events to East Africa. Kabalega International Airport is being developed as a critical piece of the infrastructure supporting Hoima and the wider Bunyoro region.

Government has allocated Shs183.7 billion for the airport’s passenger terminal and related operationalisation, with the objective of opening the facility to commercial passenger traffic ahead of AFCON 2027. The airport is strategically located close to Hoima City Stadium, one of the venues being prepared for the continental tournament. Government has also been investing heavily in roads, accommodation and other infrastructure around Hoima and Masindi.

The convergence is significant.

  • An airport brings people.
  • A stadium brings audiences.
  • Oil brings investment.

Tourism brings visitors and connectivity allows all four to interact.

For Africa, the development represents a broader question about how major infrastructure can transform regions beyond traditional capitals. Hoima is emerging as an important node in Uganda’s western economic landscape, while the airport has the potential to connect Bunyoro more efficiently with other African markets and international destinations.

Uganda’s oil sector is expected to create demand for aviation, logistics, accommodation, professional services, construction, food supply chains and other supporting industries. At the same time, AFCON 2027 will bring football teams, officials, media, supporters and commercial activity into the region. That creates an opportunity for sporting infrastructure to become economic infrastructure.

Uganda is now approximately nine months from the opening of AFCON 2027. The Local Organising Committee says the country is targeting completion of its three competition stadiums by the end of December 2026, while CAF continues to assess infrastructure and operational readiness.

Recent CAF engagements have also highlighted the importance of accommodation, visas and upcountry infrastructure, underscoring that hosting a continental tournament requires much more than stadiums. This is where Kabalega International Airport becomes strategically important. The question is no longer simply whether aircraft can land. The bigger question is what economic ecosystem will grow around every landing.

  • Will local farmers supply hotels?
  • Will young people find new skills and employment?
  • Will tourism operators package Bunyoro for African and international visitors?
  • Will local manufacturers and service providers enter the supply chains?
  • Will the airport become a genuine commercial gateway rather than an event-driven facility?

Those are the questions that will determine the airport’s long-term legacy.

The arrival of passenger flights should therefore be viewed as the beginning of a longer journey. AFCON 2027 can provide the immediate catalyst. Oil can provide a major economic anchor. But the enduring objective should be to build a connected, productive and investment-ready Bunyoro whose infrastructure continues generating value long after the final whistle of the tournament.

Kabalega International Airport could ultimately become more than a transport facility. It could become a gateway through which Bunyoro connects its people, resources, businesses and opportunities to Uganda, East Africa and the wider African market and as the first passenger aircraft touches down, that future is no longer only being planned on paper—it is beginning to take flight.

 

 

A person can die, but what they have done can outlive their life. That is perhaps the most enduring way to remember Moses Matovu, the legendary musician, saxophonist, composer and longtime leader of Afrigo Band, who died on September 24, 2026, at the age of 77. His death has brought grief to Uganda’s music fraternity and to generations of people who encountered his music not simply as entertainment, but as part of the soundtrack of their lives. Yet, as Uganda mourns, there is a larger story worth remembering. It is the story of a man whose cultural contribution crossed generations, communities and social boundaries.

For more than five decades, Moses Matovu helped carry Ugandan live music through changing political, social and technological landscapes. Afrigo Band, which emerged in the mid-1970s, became one of the country’s longest-running musical institutions, reaching its 50th anniversary in 2025. Matovu remained central to that journey as vocalist, instrumentalist, composer, arranger and bandleader. That longevity is not merely a musical achievement. It is a cultural achievement.

Diplomacy is often associated with ambassadors, treaties, official visits and negotiating tables. But nations also communicate through culture. Musicians, artists, writers and filmmakers can carry a country’s identity across borders in ways that formal diplomacy sometimes cannot.

Moses Matovu was one of those cultural ambassadors, through Afrigo Band, Ugandan rhythms, melodies and stories travelled beyond the conventional boundaries of diplomacy. His work helped demonstrate that Uganda’s international identity is not defined only by political institutions or economic statistics, but also by its creativity, heritage and cultural memory. That is why his legacy belongs not only to the entertainment industry. It belongs to Uganda’s broader cultural history.

There is another dimension of Matovu’s life that has emerged with particular poignancy following his death. Many people who knew his music may not have known that he was Muslim. His funeral prayers were held at Kibuli Mosque before his body was taken to the National Theatre and later to Kyanja for burial. Perhaps that tells us something important about the man.

His faith did not need to become a public identity competing with his art. His music brought people together without requiring them to first ask who he was, what faith he followed or which community he belonged to. In death, that dimension of his identity has become another reminder of Uganda’s plural cultural character. A Muslim musician could become a national cultural figure whose work was embraced across religious and social communities. That, too, is a form of cultural diplomacy.

Matovu’s greatest achievement may not have been any individual performance or song.

It may have been continuity, He remained with Afrigo through generations of musicians and audiences, helping nurture younger talent and sustaining a band whose history became intertwined with Uganda’s own musical evolution. Afrigo’s survival for half a century speaks to more than individual talent; it speaks to discipline, mentorship, institutional memory and an understanding that culture must be handed from one generation to another. That is the lesson cultural institutions everywhere can learn from his life. Talent can create a moment.

At Daily Thinkers, where we believe that journalism should preserve context, memory and meaning beyond the day’s headlines, we remember Moses Matovu not simply because he was famous, but because he contributed something that cannot easily be measured.

He helped give Uganda a sound.

He helped preserve a generation.

He helped introduce younger musicians to a tradition that might otherwise have disappeared and he demonstrated that culture can remain relevant without abandoning its roots.

On behalf of Shanix Marketing and Media Agency, and personally, I extend my deepest condolences to the family of Moses Matovu, his colleagues at Afrigo Band, the Ugandan music fraternity and all those whose lives were touched by his music. His saxophone may have fallen silent but the music continues and perhaps that is the greatest tribute a musician can receive. Moses Matovu is gone. The legacy remains. The music remains. Uganda remembers.

May his soul rest in eternal peace.

 

The United Arab Emirates’ decision to ease the precautionary entry measures imposed on Ugandan nationals marks an important moment for Uganda’s international connectivity and economic diplomacy.

The measures were introduced on 6 June 2026 amid concerns linked to the Ebola outbreak and included suspension of new visas and restrictions on entry. On 26 September, the UAE announced that the measures affecting Uganda would be eased following Uganda’s successful completion of the required monitoring period and the official declaration that the country was Ebola-free.  The timing is significant because the disruption came just as Uganda’s international tourism, aviation and investment sectors were showing strong momentum.

Uganda entered 2026 from a relatively strong tourism position. In 2025, international tourist arrivals increased 19.7 percent to 1.64 million, while tourism receipts reached approximately US$1.62 billion (Shs5.83 trillion) a 21.3 percent increase over the previous year. The 2025 arrival figure was also about 106 percent of the 2019 pre-pandemic level.  The impact of the subsequent travel disruptions can be seen particularly clearly through aviation statistics. Entebbe International Airport handled:

Period International passengers Year-on-year position
June 2026 131,246 70,514 fewer than June 2025
July 2026 156,342 70,667 fewer than July 2025
August 2026 169,706 69,623 fewer than August 2025

Across those three months, Entebbe recorded 210,804 fewer international passenger movements than in the corresponding months of 2025. August alone was 29.1 percent below August 2025, despite July–August normally being a peak travel period. Uganda Civil Aviation Authority attributed the decline in part to recent travel restrictions.

These figures should not be described as US-dollar economic losses, because passenger movements are not equivalent to tourism expenditure or trade value. They are better understood as an indicator of the scale of lost international connectivity and economic activity during the disruption. The effect has also been felt directly by businesses. In August, Daily Monitor reported the case of a Ugandan tour operator who lost a school-group booking worth approximately US$5,000 after the clients postponed their Uganda trip because of health concerns.

The UAE is not simply another destination in Uganda’s international network. It has become an increasingly important commercial, investment and logistical partner. Uganda’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs reported that bilateral trade with the UAE had reached US$2.85 billion by September 2025, while UAE investment in Uganda was estimated at approximately US$3.5 billion across sectors including energy, infrastructure, agribusiness, oil and gas, manufacturing, real estate and tourism.

More recent preparations for the 5th Uganda–UAE Business Forum cite bilateral trade of approximately US$4.7 billion in 2025, compared with about US$2.7 billion in 2024 and US$600 million in 2018. UAE foreign direct investment in Uganda was estimated at about US$3.5 billion in 2025.  These figures demonstrate why restoring smooth movement between the two countries matters beyond passenger travel. Connectivity supports business travel, tourism, investment missions, cargo, market access, remittances, education, professional mobility and investor confidence.

The UAE’s easing of measures comes at a particularly important point in Uganda’s economic diplomacy calendar. The 5th Uganda–UAE Business Forum, scheduled for 26–29 October 2026 across Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Sharjah and Fujairah, is intended to connect Ugandan businesses with UAE investors, buyers, financial institutions and strategic partners. Its priority sectors include agriculture and agro-processing, trade and exports, mining and minerals, tourism, infrastructure, energy, logistics and air cargo, manufacturing, financial services and technology.

The easing of the entry measures therefore creates an opportunity to move the conversation from restriction and recovery to confidence and commercial renewal. But reopening alone will not recover opportunities that may have been deferred during the disruption. Uganda now needs to use the period before the forum to reassure markets, reconnect buyers and investors, restore travel confidence, communicate the country’s health preparedness, and ensure that Ugandan companies arrive in the UAE with concrete products, investment propositions and export-ready opportunities.

The Ministry of Health declared Uganda Ebola-free on 28 July 2026, following completion of the required 42-day monitoring period without new cases. The UAE’s subsequent decision reflects that public-health assessment.

The immediate task is therefore not simply to celebrate the lifting of a precautionary measure. It is to convert restored access into restored economic activity. For Uganda, that means presenting a clear message to the UAE and wider global market: Uganda is open, its public-health surveillance systems have demonstrated resilience, and its economic opportunities remain available. For the upcoming business forum, this creates an opportunity to address three questions directly:

  • What was interrupted? International mobility, tourism bookings, business travel and some commercial activity.
  • What must be restored? Confidence, connectivity, market access and business relationships.
  • What should come next? New investment, stronger exports, tourism recovery, air-cargo growth, technology partnerships and measurable commercial agreements.

The real measure of the next phase of Uganda–UAE economic diplomacy should therefore extend beyond meetings and declarations. It should be reflected in contracts signed, investment mobilised, exports generated, tourists returning, businesses connected and jobs created the very outcomes organisers of the 2026 forum have identified as measures of success.

The easing of UAE entry measures is therefore more than a travel development. It is a timely opportunity to reopen a corridor of confidence between Uganda and one of its increasingly important economic partners and to enter the October business forum with recovery translated into opportunity.

Kampala, Uganda –Uganda’s National Social Security Fund (NSSF) has declared a 22.53 per cent interest rate for members for the financial year 2025/26, the highest rate announced in the Fund’s 40-year history. The declaration places renewed attention on a question extending beyond retirement savings: how Uganda can increasingly use its growing pool of domestic institutional capital to support economic transformation while safeguarding the interests of savers.

The rate, announced by Minister of Finance, Planning and Economic Development Henry Musasizi at NSSF’s 14th Annual Members’ Meeting, will see approximately Shs5.44 trillion credited to members’ accounts. This compares with an interest allocation of about Shs2.5 trillion associated with the 13.5 per cent rate declared for 2024/25.

The scale of the latest distribution reflects the expansion of NSSF itself. The Fund reported strong growth in income during the financial year, while assets under management increased from approximately Shs26 trillion to Shs32 trillion. Member contributions also continued to rise, demonstrating the growing volume of long-term savings being mobilised through the formal social security system.

For Uganda, the significance of this growth extends beyond the balance sheets of individual savers. A large pension fund creates a substantial pool of patient capital that can potentially participate in government securities, equities, infrastructure, private enterprise and other long-term investments.

NSSF reported investing approximately Shs4.32 trillion in Uganda’s economy during the financial year. Government securities accounted for about 76 per cent of this investment, while approximately 18 per cent was invested in equities, including listed companies.

The investment pattern illustrates the dual role of a large pension institution. NSSF must generate competitive and sustainable returns for members, while its investment activities also have wider effects on the availability of capital within the economy. This is where the development question becomes important.

Uganda requires substantial long-term financing for infrastructure, industrialisation, agriculture, housing, energy and private-sector development. Domestic institutional investors can potentially complement government revenues, commercial bank lending and external development financing.

However, pension assets are ultimately members’ savings. Their deployment therefore has to remain consistent with the Fund’s legal mandate, investment rules and responsibility to generate appropriate returns.

The issue is consequently not whether NSSF should simply invest more in development projects, but which investments can simultaneously meet sound financial requirements and contribute to Uganda’s productive capacity.

The discussion at the annual meeting pointed to major infrastructure projects, including the proposed Kampala–Jinja Expressway, as potential areas for NSSF participation. Such projects illustrate the potential connection between pension capital and national infrastructure development. Where commercially viable structures exist, institutional investors can provide long-term financing that complements public resources.

NSSF Board Chairman David Ogong, however, noted that the Fund’s investment activities remain subject to the legal framework governing its operations. This is significant because the availability of capital does not by itself determine where pension funds can be invested.

For policymakers, the challenge is therefore to create investment structures in which commercially sound projects can attract institutional capital without converting pension savings into instruments of policy financing that expose members to inappropriate risks.

NSSF’s role is also becoming increasingly regional. The Fund has invested more than Shs10 trillion in Kenya, Tanzania and Rwanda as part of its diversification strategy. This gives the Fund an additional relevance to Uganda’s economic and commercial diplomacy.

Regional integration is often discussed in terms of trade, customs, infrastructure and movement of people. Yet capital is another important component of regional economic integration. When Ugandan institutional investors participate in neighbouring markets, they become part of the financial architecture supporting the wider East African economy. Such investments can also provide portfolio diversification while exposing Ugandan institutional capital to businesses and financial markets beyond the domestic economy.

The regional dimension therefore presents an intersection between investment strategy and economic diplomacy: Uganda’s institutions are not only seeking opportunities abroad but are also participating in the development of interconnected East African markets.

The Fund’s long-term strategy gives this trend an even larger potential scale. NSSF currently has approximately 3.6 million registered members, with about 2.7 million having balances. During the first year of its new strategy, the Fund targeted 300,000 new savers and reported enrolling approximately 311,000.

Its longer-term ambition is to reach 15 million savers and grow assets to Shs80 trillion by 2035, after revising an earlier Shs50 trillion target. If achieved, such growth would substantially expand Uganda’s domestic pool of long-term capital.

It would also make questions surrounding capital allocation increasingly important. The larger the Fund becomes, the greater the potential economic consequences of its investment decisions not only for individual savers but also for capital markets, government financing, infrastructure and private investment.

For Uganda’s economic diplomacy, NSSF provides an example of how domestic financial institutions can become part of a broader strategy for economic transformation. A stronger domestic savings base can reduce exclusive dependence on external sources of long-term finance. At the same time, regional investment allows Ugandan institutions to participate in markets across East Africa.

This does not mean that pension funds should replace foreign investment or development finance. Rather, domestic institutional capital can potentially work alongside these sources of financing, particularly where investment opportunities are structured around commercially viable projects. The growing size of NSSF also creates a platform for greater engagement between financial institutions, government agencies, businesses and Uganda’s economic missions abroad. Identifying viable investment opportunities, understanding regional markets and supporting Ugandan institutional investors are increasingly interconnected aspects of economic diplomacy.

The 22.53 per cent interest rate is therefore an important headline, but it is not the only measure of NSSF’s significance. The deeper issue is what happens as the Fund continues to grow. The immediate benefit is the higher amount credited to members. The longer-term significance lies in whether Uganda can build an investment ecosystem capable of converting growing domestic savings into productive capital while maintaining prudent risk management and sustainable returns.

With assets of approximately Shs32 trillion, millions of members and an expanding regional investment portfolio, NSSF occupies an increasingly important position within Uganda’s financial and economic architecture. Its next phase will consequently be measured not only by the size of annual interest declarations, but also by the quality of the capital allocation decisions behind them how effectively pension savings are protected, diversified and channelled into investments capable of generating lasting economic value.

For Uganda’s economic diplomacy, the emerging opportunity is clear in structural terms: a growing domestic savings base can become an important source of long-term capital for Uganda and the wider East African economy, provided that development objectives and the fiduciary interests of savers remain properly aligned.

Kampala,— Uganda and the European Union marked five decades of partnership with a special photographic exhibition at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Headquarters in Kampala, using the stories of Ugandans to reflect on the evolution of a relationship that has expanded from development cooperation into trade, investment, education, climate action, security and humanitarian cooperation.

Held under the theme “Together, Tukola, Built by Uganda, Backed by the European Union,” the exhibition brought together Government representatives, the European Union Delegation and Heads of Mission from EU Member States. The exhibition featured 12 Ugandan “icons” whose experiences illustrated the human dimension of the partnership, including entrepreneurs, farmers, health workers, creatives, engineers and refugees.

Representing the Government of Uganda, the Minister of State for Foreign Affairs in charge of Regional Cooperation, Hon. Haruna Kyeyune Kasolo, described the anniversary as an opportunity to reflect on the evolution of the relationship and its future direction. “For 50 years, the Uganda-EU partnership has been part of Uganda’s development story. From rebuilding infrastructure and expanding essential services to supporting education, livelihoods, innovation and sustainable growth, this cooperation has touched the lives of many Ugandans across generations,” Hon. Kasolo said.

The partnership dates back to May 1976, when the European Community opened its delegation in Kampala. At the time, the European Community had nine member states; today, the European Union comprises 27 Member States. Over the intervening five decades, the relationship has expanded considerably. According to the EU Delegation, the EU and its Member States, working as Team Europe, have provided more than €5 billion in development support to Uganda over the past five decades, alongside substantial European private investment.

The economic relationship has also become increasingly significant. EU trade data show that in 2024, EU imports from Uganda were valued at €1.077 billion, while EU exports to Uganda stood at €739 million, bringing total merchandise trade to approximately €1.82 billion. EU imports from Uganda were dominated by agricultural products, which accounted for about €1 billion, highlighting the importance of agriculture and value addition to Uganda’s commercial engagement with the European market.

The shift towards a more commercially oriented relationship was also highlighted by Mr. Vincent Waiswa Bagiire, Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, who noted that the partnership was entering a phase in which trade and investment would play a greater role alongside established development cooperation. The transition, he observed, provided an opportunity to build on previous achievements while aligning cooperation more closely with Uganda’s long-term economic priorities.

EU Ambassador to Uganda H.E. Jan Sadek said the photographic exhibition was intended to place people at the centre of the Golden Jubilee story. “A partnership is ultimately measured not only in years, but in lives changed. These twelve stories remind us that behind every programme, investment or policy, there are Ugandans whose determination, talent and enterprise are helping shape the country’s future,” Ambassador Sadek said.

The exhibition reflected cooperation across renewable energy, education, health, gender equality, human rights, agriculture, infrastructure, environmental conservation and the creative economy. Earlier in 2026, Ambassador Sadek noted that the partnership had evolved into a broad relationship encompassing trade and investment, energy and climate action, education and health, humanitarian support and regional stability.

Looking towards the next 50 years, Hon. Kasolo emphasised the importance of cooperation that responds to Uganda’s changing economic priorities. He highlighted climate finance, value-added trade, education, innovation and stronger connections between universities and enterprises as areas for deeper engagement. He also pointed to opportunities in infrastructure and energy, health and education, agricultural processing, construction and services, while emphasising the importance of increasing the value of Ugandan exports through improved certification, storage, post-harvest systems, engineering and processing.

Agriculture remains central to this agenda. Coffee, fish, flowers and fruits are among Uganda’s export interests in European markets, while the scale of EU imports from Uganda in 2024 demonstrated the continuing importance of agricultural commodities in the relationship.

The partnership also carries an important humanitarian dimension. Uganda hosts more than two million refugees and has continued to work with international partners on refugee protection, livelihoods and social and economic inclusion. The Golden Jubilee exhibition therefore presented the Uganda-EU relationship not simply as a record of five decades of official cooperation, but as an evolving partnership expressed through institutions, businesses, communities and individual lives.

As Uganda and the European Union look beyond the 50-year milestone, the emphasis is increasingly on converting established cooperation into expanded trade, investment, skills, innovation and sustainable economic opportunities, while preserving the dialogue and institutional relationships that have sustained the partnership since 1976.

 

New York,— Uganda has reaffirmed its commitment to advancing legal equality for women and girls, calling for stronger implementation of laws and institutions to ensure that formal legal protections translate into meaningful rights and opportunities across communities.

Uganda’s position was presented on 23 September at a high-level side event convened by UN Women at United Nations Headquarters in New York, on the margins of the 81st Session of the United Nations General Assembly. The discussion brought together governments, United Nations entities, civil society organisations and advocates around the continuing challenge of discriminatory laws affecting women and girls.

Representing the Government of Uganda, Ambassador Rebecca Amuge Otengo, Uganda’s Permanent Representative to the African Union, spoke on behalf of the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Adonia Ayebare. She highlighted Uganda’s constitutional guarantees and recent legislative reforms while emphasising that the effectiveness of legal equality ultimately depends on implementation, institutional capacity and access to justice.

One of the reforms highlighted was Uganda’s Succession (Amendment) Act, 2022, which amended succession law to bring it into conformity with the Constitution and to strengthen gender equality in succession and inheritance. The legislation also provides for protection of principal residential property for surviving spouses and lineal descendants and removes discriminatory elements relating to customary heirs and heiresses.

The reform has particular significance for women’s economic security. UN Women’s country-level legal database notes that the amended succession framework expanded property-distribution provisions to both male and female dependants and spouses and refined the definition of customary heir or heiress to remove discrimination. Yet Uganda’s intervention placed equal emphasis on the distance that can exist between legislation and lived experience.

Amb. Otengo stressed the importance of ensuring that legal reforms are supported by accessible institutions, effective enforcement, public awareness, adequate financing and survivor-centred approaches to justice. The emphasis reflects a broader recognition that the passage of legislation is only one stage in achieving equality: rights must also be understood, accessible and enforceable.

This implementation dimension is particularly relevant to Africa, where questions of legal equality intersect with access to land and property, citizenship and nationality, political participation, justice systems and the economic position of women and girls.

Uganda therefore identified three areas requiring accelerated attention.

The first is the reform of discriminatory laws and the closing of the gap between legal provisions and their practical application. This includes strengthening institutions responsible for enforcement, ensuring adequate financing and developing accountability mechanisms capable of measuring whether legal protections are reaching intended beneficiaries.

The second is meaningful participation by women in the institutions responsible for making and enforcing laws. Uganda emphasised that women’s participation should extend beyond minimum numerical representation to substantive involvement in shaping legislation, public policy and justice systems.

The third is ensuring that legal equality reaches women who can face additional structural barriers, including women affected by conflict, women with disabilities and women living in rural and underserved communities.

The discussion also placed legal equality within the wider development agenda. Equal access to citizenship, property, inheritance and justice affects women’s ability to participate fully in economic and public life and therefore has implications beyond the legal sector.

For Africa, this connection between rights, institutions and development is particularly important as the continent advances regional commitments on women’s empowerment, inclusive governance and sustainable development.

Uganda’s intervention consequently framed legal equality not simply as a question of legislative drafting but as an institutional and societal responsibility. The objective is to ensure that constitutional guarantees and statutory reforms are reflected in the everyday experiences of women and girls.

The country’s position also underscores the importance of women’s leadership in sustaining legal and institutional reform. Women must not only be beneficiaries of legal protection but active participants in lawmaking, implementation, oversight and accountability.

As the international community works towards 2030, Uganda’s message from New York was that progress should be measured not only by the number of laws enacted, but by whether those laws are accessible, understood and enforced. The broader challenge for Africa is therefore one of implementation: converting commitments to equality into institutions that work, rights that can be exercised and justice that can be reached.

Uganda’s contribution placed that implementation challenge at the centre of its engagement, linking legal equality with equal citizenship, inclusive development and stronger institutions across the continent.

New York,— Uganda has called for stronger regional cooperation, coordinated border governance and sustainable support for African-led peace and security mechanisms as African states confront terrorism and violent extremism that increasingly operate across national boundaries.

Uganda made the call during the 1369th Ministerial Meeting of the African Union Peace and Security Council, held in New York on 23 September 2026 on the margins of the 81st Session of the United Nations General Assembly. The meeting considered the theme “Good Neighbourliness and Regional Responses to Security and Terrorism Challenges in Africa.”

The African Union has confirmed that the session focused on strengthening African cooperation against security threats that transcend national borders, with particular attention to good neighbourliness, intelligence-sharing, early warning, border governance, terrorist financing and cooperation among Member States, Regional Economic Communities and Regional Mechanisms.

Representing Uganda, Ambassador Rebecca Amuge Otengo, Uganda’s Permanent Representative to the African Union and the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, stressed that terrorism and violent extremism require responses that extend beyond individual national jurisdictions. “Terrorism and violent extremism do not respect borders,” Ambassador Otengo said, pointing to the exploitation of ungoverned spaces, local grievances, weak border controls, illicit financial flows and transnational criminal networks.

Uganda’s intervention placed good neighbourliness at the centre of the continental security response. In this context, good neighbourliness was presented not simply as a diplomatic principle but as a practical requirement for security cooperation among states sharing borders and facing common threats.

The approach is consistent with the wider AU discussion surrounding the 1369th PSC meeting. The African Union has emphasised that borders are simultaneously spaces of state sovereignty and areas where communities live, trade and maintain social and cultural connections. The AU has therefore called for stronger cooperation among neighbouring states while strengthening existing continental frameworks rather than creating parallel mechanisms.

Uganda called for enhanced intelligence-sharing, joint threat assessments and closer cooperation among security and law-enforcement agencies. It also advocated stronger support for the African Union Counter-Terrorism Centre to improve coordination, intelligence fusion and institutional capacity.

Border governance formed another important part of Uganda’s position. The delegation called for strengthened implementation of the African Union Border Programme and the Niamey Convention on Cross-Border Cooperation, while emphasising the importance of involving border communities in preventing insecurity.

The argument is that border security cannot be separated from the economic and social conditions of border populations. Investment in public services, livelihoods and legitimate cross-border trade can complement security measures and help transform border areas into spaces of economic interaction and cooperation.

Uganda also placed emphasis on the operational capacity of African peace and security institutions. It called for the African Standby Force and its regional components to develop the capabilities required for timely deployment, including sustainable logistics and predictable financing, while operating consistently with Member States’ sovereignty and international law.

Financing remains a central issue in the wider AU-UN peace and security partnership. UN Security Council Resolution 2719, adopted unanimously on 21 December 2023, established a framework under which African Union-led peace support operations authorised by the Security Council may access UN assessed contributions, subject to the conditions and arrangements set out in the resolution.

The UN has subsequently worked with the AU on operationalising that framework, including joint planning and decision-making, mission support, financing and budgeting, as well as human-rights compliance and protection of civilians.

Uganda’s intervention also connected security policy with the underlying conditions that can contribute to instability. The delegation identified exclusion, youth unemployment, radicalisation, disinformation, arms trafficking and terrorism financing among issues requiring attention alongside security operations.

Women, young people, traditional leaders, civil society and the private sector were identified as important participants in prevention, community resilience and efforts to address vulnerabilities that armed and terrorist groups can exploit.

Another priority was stronger institutional coordination. Uganda called for clearer cooperation among the African Union, Regional Economic Communities and Regional Mechanisms in order to reduce duplication and establish clearer responsibilities in responding to transnational threats.

The emphasis on coordination reflects the increasingly cross-border character of terrorism and organised crime. The AU’s own deliberations have highlighted the need for intelligence-sharing, harmonised legal frameworks, early warning and stronger action against terrorist financing.

Uganda’s position therefore linked continental security to regional integration. The argument is that effective cooperation against terrorism requires neighbouring states to maintain channels of communication even when political differences exist, while ensuring that national sovereignty and territorial integrity remain respected.

The wider international dimension is equally important. African-led security responses increasingly operate within a partnership involving the African Union, Regional Economic Communities, the United Nations and other international partners. Resolution 2719 provides one part of the emerging institutional framework for that partnership, while the AU continues to develop its own continental peace and security capabilities.

For Uganda, the central message from New York was therefore one of shared responsibility: terrorism cannot be addressed through isolated national measures when threats, financing networks, recruitment patterns and criminal activity cross borders. “Africa’s borders must not divide our security efforts,” Ambassador Otengo said, underscoring Uganda’s call for trust, coordinated action and stronger regional institutions.

Uganda’s contribution to the 1369th PSC Ministerial Meeting placed good neighbourliness, regional cooperation, effective continental institutions and sustainable financing within the broader African and international peace and security agenda. The challenge now lies in translating these principles into sustained cooperation on the ground: stronger intelligence networks, effective border governance, resilient communities, capable regional institutions and predictable support for African-led peace and security operations.

 

Kampala, Uganda — It is a cold morning in Uganda, and for a country accustomed to hearing the warm sounds of Afrigo Band across generations, the news of the death of Moses Matovu has brought an unusual silence.

Matovu, the veteran musician, saxophonist, vocalist, composer and longtime leader of Afrigo Band, died at Kibuli Hospital on Thursday morning after reportedly being attacked by unidentified assailants in Kampala. Reports indicate that he was attacked while on his way to a mosque for morning prayers and was subsequently rushed to hospital. The circumstances of the attack and the identities and motive of the assailants remain under investigation.

For Uganda’s cultural community, however, the significance of Matovu’s death extends far beyond the circumstances of his final hours. It marks the passing of one of the principal custodians of a musical tradition that has accompanied Uganda through decades of political, social and cultural change.

Born in Kampala in 1949, Matovu entered professional music in the 1960s, first performing with the Thunderbirds Band before moving through the Police Band and Cranes Band. In 1975, following the collapse of the Cranes Band, he and fellow musicians established Afrigo Band. What followed was one of the most enduring stories in Uganda’s popular music.

Afrigo reached its 50th anniversary in 2025, a milestone that reflected not merely the longevity of a musical group but the extraordinary ability of a cultural institution to remain relevant across generations. Under Matovu’s leadership, the band developed a distinctive sound drawing from African rumba, jazz, funk and local Ugandan musical traditions, with Luganda lyrics helping anchor its music in Ugandan cultural expression.

For generations of Ugandans, Afrigo was more than entertainment. It became part of the soundtrack of national life. Matovu’s saxophone and voice were therefore not simply instruments of performance. They were instruments of memory. This is where the loss of Moses Matovu acquires a broader significance for cultural diplomacy.

Countries do not communicate their identity to the world only through embassies, official statements and diplomatic meetings. They also speak through music, literature, film, food, fashion, sport and the creative arts.

Artists can become informal cultural ambassadors because they carry elements of their societies with them wherever they perform. Their work can introduce foreign audiences to a country’s language, rhythms, history, values and imagination without the need for a formal diplomatic message.

Afrigo embodied this dimension of Uganda’s international cultural presence. The band has performed for Ugandan communities in the diaspora, including audiences in Europe and the United States, helping maintain cultural connections between Ugandans abroad and the country of their heritage.

In 2016, Afrigo was also recognised by the Kabaka of Buganda for its contribution to the preservation of culture, with Matovu publicly associated with that recognition. Such moments demonstrate how cultural institutions can operate at the intersection of identity, heritage and international engagement.

Matovu’s greatest legacy may ultimately be found not in a single song or performance, but in the continuity he helped create. He remained active in music for decades while nurturing younger musicians and advocating for the preservation of culture. In a 2024 engagement with young learners, Matovu encouraged parents to recognise and nurture children’s creative abilities, describing culture as foundational to identity.

That message is particularly relevant at a time when Uganda’s creative industries are increasingly connected to digital platforms, international audiences and the wider African cultural economy. The death of a cultural figure of Matovu’s generation consequently raises an important question: how does a country preserve the knowledge carried by its cultural pioneers?

Recordings must be preserved. Oral histories must be documented. Musical archives must be digitised. Young artists must have opportunities to learn from those who built Uganda’s creative industries before them. And cultural institutions need the capacity to ensure that important artistic legacies do not disappear with their creators. Cultural diplomacy ultimately depends on cultural memory.

Uganda will mourn Moses Matovu as a musician, but history may remember him as something larger: a custodian of a particular chapter in Uganda’s cultural story.

Afrigo’s five-decade journey demonstrated that music can outlive political eras, technological changes and shifting public tastes. Its survival created a bridge between generations of Ugandans and provided a recognisable expression of Ugandan creativity to audiences beyond the country’s borders. His death therefore invites more than condolences. It invites reflection on how Uganda values, documents and projects its cultural heritage.

As the police investigation into the circumstances of his death continues, the country waits for answers. But alongside the search for justice is another responsibility: to ensure that the music, stories, recordings and lessons of Moses Matovu’s generation remain accessible to those who come after them.

On this cold September morning, Uganda has lost a musician but it has also lost a keeper of memory and somewhere beneath the grief, the question remains: who will carry the music forward?  Moses Matovu, may your soul rest in peace.

Entebbe— President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni has bid farewell to India’s outgoing High Commissioner to Uganda, H.E. Upender Singh Rawat, commending him for his contribution to the longstanding relations between Uganda and India.

President Museveni received H.E. Rawat during a farewell call at State House, Entebbe, where he thanked the outgoing envoy for his service to Uganda and wished him success in his next tour of duty. “Thank you for your service in Uganda, and I wish you good luck in your next tour of duty,” President Museveni told the outgoing High Commissioner.

Before meeting the President, H.E. Rawat held a farewell meeting with the Minister of State for Foreign Affairs (Regional Cooperation), Hon. Haruna Kasolo Kyeyune, at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The meeting provided an opportunity to reflect on the progress of Uganda–India relations and the continued importance of strengthening cooperation in trade, investment, education, health, technology and other areas of mutual interest.

H.E. Rawat served in Uganda for three years and three months, during which bilateral engagement continued across political, economic, technical and people-to-people spheres. His tenure also coincided with renewed efforts to expand economic diplomacy and identify opportunities for greater Ugandan participation in the Indian market.

Trade remained one of the most important dimensions of the Uganda–India relationship. According to an Economic Policy Research Centre (EPRC) study based on ITC Trade Map data, Uganda’s exports to India stood at approximately US$459 million in 2024, while imports from India were about US$1.3 billion. This placed total recorded merchandise trade at roughly US$1.76 billion, with Uganda recording a merchandise trade deficit of approximately US$841 million.

Uganda’s exports to India were heavily concentrated in commodities, particularly gold and coffee. Gold and other precious metals accounted for approximately US$353 million of exports in 2024, while coffee contributed about US$78.5 million. On the other side of the trading relationship, India supplied Uganda with a range of manufactured and value-added products, including pharmaceuticals, machinery, vehicles and other industrial goods.

The figures illustrate both the depth of commercial relations and the scope for further diversification. EPRC has identified agricultural products, coffee, gold and emerging commodities such as cashew among areas where Uganda has export potential, while pharmaceuticals, motorcycles and agro-industrial inputs remain among India’s areas of export strength to Uganda.

The two countries took steps to strengthen the institutional framework for addressing these opportunities. On 25–26 March 2025, Uganda and India convened the Third Meeting of the India–Uganda Joint Trade Committee in New Delhi, where the two sides discussed bilateral trade and investment and explored measures to enhance economic cooperation. The meeting was significant in reactivating a key bilateral mechanism after a long interval; it was the first JTC meeting since the earlier sessions held decades previously.

The engagement was followed by additional business and investment activities. In March 2025, the Indian High Commission organised an India Trade Show and Exhibition in Kampala involving Indian companies and Ugandan business institutions. Later that year, a policy dialogue on bilateral relations, trade, investment and collaboration was organised with EPRC and IBF Uganda, alongside business-to-business engagements involving Indian companies.

Beyond commerce, the relationship has increasingly included practical cooperation in education, science and security. A notable milestone was the establishment of the National Forensic Sciences University (NFSU) Uganda Campus in Jinja, inaugurated on 12 April 2023 by India’s External Affairs Minister, Dr. S. Jaishankar. It became NFSU’s first overseas campus and India’s first overseas campus for a public academic institution. The campus offers programmes and training in areas including forensic science, cyber security, digital forensics and police and security studies. The campus therefore represents a shift in bilateral cooperation from conventional diplomatic and commercial engagement towards specialised knowledge transfer and institutional capacity building.

India’s development partnership with Uganda has also included concessional financing and technical cooperation. During Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 2018 visit to Uganda, India announced a US$141 million line of credit for electricity transmission and substations and a further US$64 million line of credit for agriculture and dairy production, alongside other development and capacity-building initiatives.

The institutional foundations of Uganda–India relations date back decades. The two countries signed an Agreement on Friendship and Technical, Economic and Scientific Cooperation in 1965, establishing a framework for technical exchange and cooperation in economic and scientific fields. More than six decades later, the relationship encompasses political consultations, trade and investment, development cooperation, education, health, pharmaceuticals, agriculture, technology, security and cultural and people-to-people exchanges.

As H.E. Rawat concluded his three-year-and-three-month tour in Uganda, his departure marked the end of one diplomatic assignment within a broader relationship that continues to evolve. The task ahead for both countries remains to translate the depth of their political and historical ties into increasingly diversified trade, investment, technology transfer, skills development and mutually beneficial economic partnerships.

 

Kampala, The Turkish Embassy in Kampala has warned the public against fabricated statements falsely attributed to the Embassy and Türkiye’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In an announcement dated 21 September 2026, the Embassy said it had become aware of statements purporting to have been issued by the Embassy and Türkiye’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. “The Embassy has noted that fabricated press statements purporting to be issued by our Embassy and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Türkiye have recently been circulated.” The Embassy categorically rejected the documents, adding: “These statements are fake and should therefore be disregarded.”

The warning comes amid heightened public attention to Uganda–Türkiye relations. The Embassy’s announcement itself, however, does not identify the specific fabricated statements or provide details about their contents.

In its advisory, the Turkish mission emphasised that official diplomatic communications should be verified through recognised institutional platforms rather than documents circulating through social media or other unofficial channels. “Official statements issued by the Embassy and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs are published exclusively through our official websites and X accounts listed below.”

The Embassy listed the official website of the Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Embassy’s Kampala website, and the verified X accounts of the Ministry and Embassy as the appropriate sources for official statements.

The Embassy’s official website currently lists the 21 September announcement among its diplomatic communications. It also carries statements issued by the Turkish Foreign Ministry on international and regional developments, providing a central record against which purported statements can be checked.

The episode highlights a growing challenge for modern diplomacy: the ability of fabricated documents and statements to circulate rapidly while appearing to carry the authority of government institutions. Diplomatic statements often have implications beyond communication. They can signal a government’s position on bilateral relations, security matters, international disputes or consular issues. A fabricated statement attributed to a foreign ministry can therefore create confusion about a country’s official position before the originating government has an opportunity to respond.

The importance of authentication is particularly relevant during periods of heightened diplomatic attention. Recent reporting indicates that Uganda–Türkiye relations have faced public controversy following a demonstration outside the Turkish Embassy in Kampala on 18 September.

On 22 September, Türkiye’s Center for Combating Disinformation also described a separate document attributed to the Turkish Foreign Ministry concerning Uganda’s Chief of Defence Forces as fabricated and said the Turkish Embassy in Kampala had confirmed that no such announcement had appeared on its official channels.

These developments illustrate why diplomatic missions increasingly rely on verified digital channels to establish an authoritative record of their positions. The warning should also be viewed within the wider context of Uganda–Türkiye relations, which extend beyond the immediate controversy.

Türkiye’s Ambassador to Uganda, H.E. Mehmet Fatih Ak, has described the bilateral relationship as “sound, comprehensive and multilayered,” covering political, military, trade and cultural relations. The Embassy has also highlighted growing Turkish investment in Uganda and cooperation in infrastructure, industrial production and employment.

The Embassy’s official record demonstrates that its communications cover a broad range of issues, from scholarships and commercial engagement to Turkish foreign-policy positions on international security and regional developments.

The mission’s latest announcement therefore serves not only as a denial of specific fabricated material but also as a reminder of the importance of distinguishing an official diplomatic communication from material that merely adopts the appearance of one. For governments, diplomatic missions and members of the public, the episode reinforces a basic principle of digital-era diplomacy: the source of a statement matters as much as the statement itself.

Government logos, letterheads, official-looking language and diplomatic terminology can be reproduced relatively easily in fabricated documents. Verification through an embassy’s official website or authenticated social-media account provides a more reliable basis for determining whether a purported diplomatic statement has actually been issued.

For Uganda–Türkiye relations, the Turkish Embassy’s 21 September announcement establishes the mission’s position clearly: documents purporting to be official statements but not appearing through its recognised communication channels should not be treated as official diplomatic communications.

As diplomatic engagement increasingly takes place in an environment shaped by social media and rapid information circulation, protecting the authenticity of official communication is becoming an important component of diplomatic practice itself.

Kampala— Uganda has renewed its call for a peaceful resolution of conflicts in the Middle East, reaffirming its position that the region’s competing political, security and identity questions should be addressed through peaceful means and within the framework of international law.

In a statement issued on 21 September 2026, the Government of Uganda said it continued to call for peaceful resolution of conflicts in the region and reiterated its opposition to wars that it considers unjust.

The statement comes as Uganda continues to articulate its positions on international peace and security through diplomatic and multilateral engagements. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has in recent days also emphasised the importance of regional cooperation, conflict prevention and addressing the cross-border effects of conflicts beyond national boundaries.

At the centre of the statement is Uganda’s call for an approach that recognises both the State of Israel and the rights of Palestinians to have their own state. The Government stated: “We appeal to all concerned to accept the State of Israel and the rights of the Palestinians to have their own State.”

Uganda characterised the unresolved nature of the Israeli-Palestinian question as one of the sources of continuing complications in the region, arguing that the failure of different actors to handle the issue in a just manner has contributed to the persistence of the conflict.

The formulation places Uganda’s position within a diplomatic framework that addresses the rights and political aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians rather than treating the conflict solely through a security lens. For Uganda, the question is therefore not only about the cessation of hostilities but also about addressing the underlying political issues that have remained central to the conflict.

The statement also addressed the question of nuclear energy, drawing a distinction between its peaceful uses and the broader security concerns surrounding nuclear capabilities. “The issue of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes,” the Government stated, “should be handled according to international law.”

The reference introduces another dimension to Uganda’s position: that questions involving nuclear technology and energy should be governed by established international legal principles rather than treated exclusively as matters of geopolitical confrontation.

This is consistent with Uganda’s broader diplomatic engagement through multilateral institutions, where questions of international peace, security, disarmament and the application of international law remain important areas of discussion.

The statement further turned to the role of religious and identity divisions in conflicts, explicitly referring to different religious communities in the Middle East, including Jews, Christians, Sunni Muslims and Shia Muslims.

Uganda argued that the politics of identity could have destabilising consequences when ethnicity or religion becomes the primary basis for political mobilisation. The Government described such politics as: “an ideological and strategic blunder and a poison for any situation.” It further connected this concern to Africa’s own historical experience, stating: “Some countries in Africa, including Uganda in the past, have been ruined by this poison.”

The reference reflects an argument that Uganda’s own historical experience provides a basis for caution against political systems or conflicts in which ethnic or religious identity becomes the principal organising principle of political competition. The statement on the Middle East comes against the background of Uganda’s broader emphasis on multilateral cooperation and regional approaches to international challenges.

Earlier in September, Uganda called for stronger regional cooperation in addressing the interconnected political, security, humanitarian and climate challenges affecting the Horn of Africa. Speaking at the 74th Extraordinary Session of the IGAD Council of Ministers in Djibouti, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs in charge of Regional Affairs, Hon. Haruna K. Kasolo, argued that transnational challenges require collective regional responses.  Uganda also urged IGAD member states to examine the spillover effects of the conflict in the Middle East on the Horn of Africa and the wider subregion.

This provides an important regional context to Kampala’s latest statement. Rather than viewing Middle Eastern conflicts as geographically confined, Uganda’s recent diplomatic messaging has highlighted the potential consequences of conflicts for neighbouring regions and international systems.

Uganda’s latest statement therefore brings together several strands of its foreign-policy messaging: peaceful settlement of conflicts, respect for international law, recognition of Palestinian statehood alongside Israel’s existence, regulation of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, and caution against identity-based political mobilisation.

The statement does not set out a detailed diplomatic roadmap for resolving the Middle East conflicts. Instead, it establishes principles that Uganda says should guide the international response. As Uganda continues its engagement in regional and multilateral diplomacy, the Middle East remains part of a wider foreign-policy environment in which Kampala is also advocating regional cooperation, conflict prevention and stronger multilateral mechanisms for addressing transnational challenges.

For Uganda, the central message is that durable peace requires more than managing individual confrontations. It requires addressing political grievances, respecting international law and avoiding forms of identity politics that can deepen divisions within and between societies.

Mubende, Uganda – Stakeholders in Mubende District have called for stronger coordination, transparency and measurable results as the Uganda Climate Smart Agricultural Transformation Project (UCSATP) moves into implementation, with particular emphasis on ensuring that the new intervention delivers lasting value chains rather than repeating challenges associated with previous agricultural support programmes.

The call was made during a UCSATP stakeholders’ engagement meeting held at the Mubende District Council Chambers on Monday, 21 September 2026. The engagement brought together district officials and other stakeholders to discuss the implementation modalities of the project, including farmer mobilisation, access to agricultural inputs, infrastructure development, monitoring, supervision and oversight.

During the meeting, Daily Thinkers sought clarification on how lessons from previous interventions, including programmes implemented under the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS), Operation Wealth Creation (OWC) and other input-distribution initiatives, had been incorporated into UCSATP’s new Electronic Voucher Management System (EVMS). Daily Thinkers also asked how the district would demonstrate that UCSATP was building sustainable value chains in coffee, livestock, beneficial insects and aquaculture, particularly through aggregation, processing, finance and reliable markets after project support ends.

The questions further focused on how UCSATP would be integrated with existing government programmes such as the Parish Development Model (PDM) and the wider agro-industrialisation agenda, rather than creating parallel farmer groups, infrastructure and reporting systems. A central question put to the stakeholders was: “At the end of UCSATP, what will be different in Mubende that was not achieved by the programmes that came before it, and what evidence will the district use to prove that difference?”

Responding to the issues raised, Fred Kisakye, the District Production and Marketing Officer for Mubende District, outlined the strategic framework through which UCSATP is expected to improve agricultural production, market access and resilience. “The Project Development Objective is to increase productivity, market access and resilience of selected value chains and to respond promptly and effectively to emergencies,” Kisakye said. He explained that the project was not limited to distributing agricultural inputs but was designed to support farmers organised in groups while developing infrastructure necessary to strengthen production and market systems.

Under UCSATP, Mubende is implementing interventions across four major value-chain areas: coffee in ten lower local governments; dairy production in five lower local governments; beef in four lower local governments; beneficial insects, including apiary and black soldier flies; and aquaculture fisheries. The project is also supporting infrastructure and enabling systems, including road improvements, community water points, irrigation facilities, laboratories and weather stations.

Kisakye said the overall objective was to increase production and productivity while improving market access and addressing the effects of climate change. He emphasised that the project also seeks to increase processing capacity so that Mubende can move beyond supplying raw agricultural commodities. “The long-term goal is to move from simple production to value-added processing involving both the public and private sectors,” Kisakye noted. He linked the transformation of the value chains to wider economic outcomes, including export growth, increased household incomes and employment opportunities.

Kisakye, however, acknowledged that increased production alone would not guarantee access to high-value markets. “There is a critical need to meet high-quality standards to compete effectively in the market,” he said. He observed that some suppliers and farmers continue to face difficulties maintaining the standards required by large-scale and high-value buyers. “A gap exists between current farmer output and the requirements of large-scale buyers,” Kisakye explained.

This places emphasis on strengthening the entire chain from production and farmer organisation to quality control, aggregation, processing and marketing.The district production officer also identified the scaling of processing capacity between public and private stakeholders and ensuring that farmers meet rigorous market standards as issues requiring sustained attention.

A major change in the delivery of critical agricultural inputs under UCSATP is the use of the Electronic Voucher Management System (EVMS). The system was launched in Mubende on 24 June 2026 in an event presided over by the Resident District Commissioner. The electronic system is intended to improve the manner in which farmers access critical inputs while strengthening transparency and accountability in the distribution process.

Kisakye said that with the project committees now fully constituted, stakeholders needed to understand the implementation arrangements, including farmer mobilisation, monitoring, supervision and oversight. The shift to an electronic mechanism also provides an opportunity to address concerns historically associated with untimely input delivery, beneficiary identification and accountability in agricultural support programmes.

Mr. Birungi Abubaker, the Deputy Resident District Commissioner (DRDC) for Mubende, stressed the importance of timely delivery of agricultural inputs and transparency regarding any contribution expected from beneficiaries. He directed attention to the practical questions that farmers need answered before implementation progresses. “The District Production Officer should ensure all products are timely,” Birungi said. He also called for clarity where beneficiaries are expected to contribute towards project activities. “If it is co-funding, how much does an individual have to contribute to this programme? Let us make it clear,” he said. His remarks placed emphasis on ensuring that farmers understand the financial obligations, if any, attached to project-supported interventions before they participate.

Beatrice Katsigazi, the Resident District Commissioner (RDC) for Mubende, emphasised the importance of communicating government programmes effectively to citizens. “All government programmes should be well communicated very well to the general public,” Katsigazi said. She added that the security leadership’s responsibility was to ensure that government programmes were implemented in accordance with established standards and government priorities. “Our work as security is to ensure all these programmes follow the available standards and the NRM Manifesto,” she said.  Her intervention highlighted the role of communication and public oversight in ensuring that intended beneficiaries understand government interventions and that implementation remains within established frameworks.

The engagement also touched on the wider development conditions affecting communities. Charles Kawuma, the District Health Educator and District HIV/AIDS Focal Person, raised concern about Mubende’s performance in immunisation. “Mubende District is poorly performing in immunisation,” Kawuma said, urging residents and stakeholders to support the forthcoming immunisation campaign. His appeal reflected the interconnected nature of agricultural transformation and broader community development, where improved household welfare depends not only on production and incomes but also on access to essential social services.

The UCSATP engagement ultimately placed the question of measurable transformation at the centre of Mubende’s agricultural agenda. For the district, the challenge will be to demonstrate that interventions in coffee, dairy and beef, beneficial insects and aquaculture translate into functioning value chains capable of connecting organised farmers to infrastructure, finance, processing facilities and dependable markets.

The test of the project will therefore extend beyond the number of farmers registered, inputs distributed or facilities constructed. It will increasingly be reflected in whether farmers can produce consistently to market standards, aggregate commercially viable volumes, access processing and financing, withstand climate-related shocks and maintain market relationships beyond the period of direct project support.

For Mubende, UCSATP provides another opportunity to strengthen its position as an agricultural production and commercial hub. The stakeholder engagement demonstrated that expectations are now extending beyond project implementation to a more fundamental question: whether the investment can convert agricultural support into durable economic systems that continue delivering value after the project cycle ends.

KYEGEGWA, UGANDA — For a Ugandan seeking a government job, Sh18 million was allegedly presented as the price of an opportunity that never materialised. What followed was a police complaint, an arrest, bank records showing at least Sh13 million entering an account bearing the name of the man identified by police as the suspect, and a written repayment acknowledgement but one question remains unanswered: What happened to the criminal investigation?

The case involving Nalubega Teopista, a staff member at St Edward’s Bukumi in Kakumiro District, raises a question beyond one disputed employment transaction: when money allegedly changes hands in connection with access to public employment, does repayment bring the matter to an end or should investigators still establish what happened, who was involved and whether an offence occurred?

Daily Thinkers seen bank records, police documentation and a written repayment acknowledgement and spoke to people familiar with the circumstances. The evidence does not establish guilt. It does establish a trail that can be investigated.

THE MONEY TRAIL

Two financial records seen by Daily Thinkers account for Sh13 million of the alleged payment. A Centenary Bank deposit slip records a cash deposit of Sh10 million on 13 March 2026 at the bank’s Mubende Branch into an account bearing the name Joseph Katende. A second Centenary Bank agent receipt records another Sh3 million payment on 26 March 2026 into an account associated with Katende. Together, the documents account for Sh13 million.

People familiar with the matter told Daily Thinkers that a further Sh5 million was allegedly sent through mobile money. That transaction has not been independently verified by Daily Thinkers and is therefore not presented as established fact.

The distinction is important, the available documents support a Sh13 million financial trail. The larger Sh18 million figure remains an allegation requiring further verification. The crucial investigative question is therefore straightforward: What happened to the Sh13 million after it entered the account? Banking records, subject to lawful investigative procedures, should provide part of that answer.

THE POLICE FILE

When the promised employment reportedly failed to materialise, Nalubega reported the matter to Kyegegwa Police Station. Police documentation seen by Daily Thinkers records:

Complainant: Nalubega Teopista

Suspect: Joseph Katende

Offence: Obtaining Money by False Pretenses Police Station: Kyegegwa Police Station

Reference: SD/67/21/03/2026

Information gathered by Daily Thinkers indicates that Katende was subsequently arrested but the publication has not established what happened to the investigation after the arrest. That leaves a series of questions:

  • Was the Sh10 million transaction verified?
  • Was the Sh3 million payment traced?
  • Was the account examined to establish where the money went?
  • Was the alleged Sh5 million mobile-money transaction investigated?
  • Were the people involved in introducing Nalubega to Katende interviewed?
  • Was the alleged government vacancy verified?
  • Was Katende found to have any official role in recruitment?
  • Was the police file submitted to prosecutors?
  • Was anyone charged?
  • Does the investigation remain open?

They are questions about whether the evidence was followed. A written acknowledgement dated 23 August 2026, seen by Daily Thinkers, records repayment of Sh13 million to Nalubega by Lubowa Dafula, described in the document as acting on behalf of Katende. The same document records a further Sh5 million as outstanding.

Daily Thinkers has not independently established whether that amount was subsequently paid or why Lubowa became responsible for the repayment.

That creates another investigative question: What was Lubowa’s connection to the original transaction, and what was the source and purpose of the repayment? But the larger legal point is equally important.

A repayment does not, by itself, establish whether a criminal offence occurred. It does not determine whether the original promise was false, who made it, whether there was an intention to defraud, whether the money was connected to a government recruitment process, or whether other people were involved. Those are matters for evidence and lawful investigation.

 

Perhaps the simplest question in the entire case has yet to be answered: Did the government job actually exist? Daily Thinkers has not independently established the alleged vacancy. The relevant authorities can Investigators and the responsible public institution should be able to establish:

  • Which institution was recruiting;
  • What position was allegedly available;
  • Whether the position was part of an approved establishment;
  • Whether the vacancy was advertised;
  • What recruitment procedure applied;
  • Whether Nalubega applied;
  • Whether she was shortlisted;
  • Whether an interview was conducted;
  • Who had authority to appoint;
  • Whether Katende had any official role in the process; and
  • Whether any official recruitment records correspond with the alleged promise.

If the vacancy existed, recruitment records should provide evidence of the process. If it did not exist, that would also be significant either way, the question is capable of being tested against official records.

THE PEOPLE BEHIND THE PAPER TRAIL

According to information gathered by Daily Thinkers, Nalubega was introduced to Patrick, a colleague at St Edward’s Bukumi. Patrick allegedly told her that he knew someone who could assist her in obtaining government employment. She was subsequently connected to Katende.

A school administrator who spoke to Daily Thinkers on condition of anonymity confirmed that Nalubega and Patrick are employees of St Edward’s Bukumi. The administrator said the school had received reports concerning the two staff members and had advised them to seek legal redress. The administrator also said conduct of that nature was inconsistent with the school’s values. The administrator’s account does not establish that any offence occurred. It does, however, identify another potential line of inquiry. Investigators could establish:

  • What exactly was Nalubega told?
  • What did Patrick know about the alleged job?
  • Who introduced Katende?
  • Was money discussed before the introduction?
  • Did Patrick receive any money or other benefit?
  • What communications exist between the people involved?

Daily Thinkers has not established that Patrick committed any offence. Those questions require evidence, not assumption.

 

A NATIONAL WARNING SIGN

The Kyegegwa case cannot be viewed entirely in isolation, Uganda’s Inspectorate of Government has documented a substantial recruitment-corruption problem involving public-sector recruitment and District Service Commissions. Its research covering 2018–2022 estimated that job seekers paid approximately UGX29 billion in recruitment-related bribes, while the cumulative value of bribes demanded was estimated at approximately UGX78 billion.

The Inspectorate reported that the health sector recorded the highest estimated value of actual bribes paid, at approximately UGX12.9 billion. Those national figures do not establish that the Kyegegwa allegation forms part of the same pattern but they provide important context. Nalubega was reportedly seeking employment in the health sector. That makes the alleged transaction particularly relevant to questions about the integrity of public recruitment.

Uganda’s recent experience also shows that recruitment allegations are not confined to one district. Complaints and investigations concerning local-government recruitment have emerged in other districts, including Zombo, Kisoro and Butaleja.

The public-interest question is therefore broader than whether one alleged transaction occurred. It is whether institutions are capable of identifying patterns, preserving evidence and following recruitment complaints through to a documented conclusion.

Daily Thinkers contacted the Kyegegwa OC CID by telephone. The officer referred the reporter to the police spokesperson for further details concerning the case registered at the station.

During that conversation, the OC CID did not provide Daily Thinkers with the substantive investigative history of the file. The publication therefore puts a straightforward question to the Uganda Police Force: What is the current status of SD/67/21/03/2026? The public does not need investigators to prejudge the case. It needs to know whether the evidence was followed.

Uganda’s constitutional framework gives the Director of Public Prosecutions authority to direct police investigations and to institute and undertake criminal proceedings in accordance with the law. That creates another traceable question: Was the Kyegegwa file submitted for prosecutorial review?

  • If it was, what decision followed?
  • If it was not, why?

Daily Thinkers is not calling for prosecution on the basis of a newspaper investigation. The publication is asking whether a documented criminal complaint, accompanied by identifiable financial evidence and followed by an arrest, received the appropriate investigative and prosecutorial assessment.

 

WHAT THE AUTHORITIES CAN NOW ESTABLISH

The case does not require speculation.

There are several identifiable lines of inquiry.

Police can establish:

  • Whether the Sh10 million and Sh3 million transactions occurred as documented;
  • What happened to the funds after entering the account;
  • Whether the alleged Sh5 million mobile-money transaction occurred;
  • Who communicated with whom concerning the alleged employment;
  • Who introduced Nalubega to Katende;
  • Whether other people were involved;
  • Whether other complaints exist;
  • Whether the alleged vacancy existed; and
  • The current status of the police file.

Kyegegwa and relevant local-government authorities can establish:

  • Whether the alleged position existed;
  • Which institution had authority to recruit;
  • Whether the position was advertised;
  • Whether Nalubega applied or was shortlisted;
  • What recruitment procedure applied; and
  • Whether Katende had any legitimate role in the process.

Prosecutors can establish:

  • Whether the police file was submitted for prosecutorial review;
  • Whether the available evidence met the applicable threshold for further action; and
  • What decision, if any, was made?

Anti-corruption authorities can establish:

  • Whether similar complaints exist;
  • Whether the same individuals, positions or methods appear in other complaints; and
  • Whether the circumstances justify a wider inquiry.

None of these steps requires anyone to be declared guilty.

They require the evidence to be tested.

Daily Thinkers has seen:

  • A bank document recording Sh10 million deposited into an account bearing Katende’s name;
  • A second bank-agent document recording Sh3 million paid into an account associated with Katende;
  • Police documentation identifying Nalubega as complainant and Katende as suspect;
  • A police reference, SD/67/21/03/2026;
  • A written acknowledgement recording repayment of Sh13 million;
  • Accounts from people familiar with aspects of the circumstances; and
  • Information indicating that Katende was arrested.

These documents and accounts do not establish criminal guilt.

They establish why further questions are reasonable.

 

WHAT WE DO NOT KNOW

Daily Thinkers has not established:

  • That Joseph Katende committed a criminal offence;
  • That Patrick committed an offence;
  • That Lubowa Dafula committed an offence;
  • That a government official participated in the alleged transaction;
  • That the alleged Sh5 million mobile-money payment occurred;
  • That the alleged government vacancy existed;
  • That other victims exist;
  • What happened to all of the money after the documented payments;
  • Whether the remaining Sh5 million was subsequently paid;
  • Whether the police investigation was completed;
  • Whether the file was submitted to the ODPP; or
  • What final decision, if any, was made on the complaint?

These gaps are not weaknesses in the investigation. They are the questions the investigation now needs to answer.

 

The alleged Sh18 million payment began, according to the complainant’s account, as a job seeker’s search for a future. It has become a test of something larger: Can an allegation involving public employment be followed from complaint, to evidence, to investigation, and finally to a documented institutional outcome? Uganda’s Inspectorate of Government has already documented the scale of recruitment-related bribery reported by job seekers. The Kyegegwa case presents a much smaller but measurable test.

  • There is a complainant.
  • There are bank records.
  • There is a police reference.
  • There was reportedly an arrest.
  • There is a written repayment acknowledgement.
  • What remains unclear is what the justice system did with the evidence.
  • That is the question Daily Thinkers is putting to the authorities:
  • Where did the money go?
  • Where is the file?
  • Was the alleged government job real?
  • What did the investigation establish?

A refund can return money. Only a proper investigation can establish what happened.

Daily Thinkers recognises the right of all persons named in this investigation to respond. Joseph Katende has not been convicted of obtaining money by false pretences. Daily Thinkers has not established that Patrick or Lubowa Dafula committed any offence, nor that a government official participated in the alleged transaction.

The Uganda Police Force, Kyegegwa District authorities, Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Inspectorate of Government, St Edward’s Bukumi and all individuals named in this investigation are invited to provide substantive responses or documentary evidence that materially clarifies the issues raised. Daily Thinkers will publish substantive responses and update this investigation where new evidence materially changes the facts established.

 

This investigation is based on documentary evidence seen by Daily Thinkers, including bank transaction records, police documentation and a written repayment acknowledge ement, together with interviews and information obtained from people familiar with the matter. The publication has independently established the existence of documents accounting for Sh13 million of the alleged payment. The alleged additional Sh5 million has not been independently verified and is therefore presented as an allegation rather than a confirmed transaction.

Daily Thinkers contacted the Kyegegwa OC CID concerning the status of the police case and sought information about the investigation. The publication has deliberately separated documented facts, attributed allegations, information from sources and unresolved questions.

The investigation does not determine criminal liability. That responsibility belongs to the competent investigative, prosecutorial and judicial authorities. Its purpose is narrower and fundamental: to follow the evidence and ask whether the institutions responsible for acting on it have done so.

 

THE QUESTION THAT REMAINS

The story began with an alleged promise of a government job. It now rests on a set of documents that can be examined, a police file that can be traced and a recruitment process that can be verified. The public-interest question is no longer simply whether someone lost money. It is whether the institutions entrusted with public employment and criminal justice can explain, transparently and lawfully, what happened next. Daily Thinkers — Thinking Beyond the Headlines.

 

In Uganda’s Busoga sub-region, a crop long associated with household food security is being positioned at the centre of a much larger industrial ambition. A US$50 million investment in Kamuli seeks to turn a staple crop into pharmaceutical inputs and industrial products—but reliable power remains a critical test

At Namasagali in Kamuli District, Dei BioPharma’s cassava processing facility is designed to process up to 500 metric tonnes of cassava a day, producing pharmaceutical-grade starch, food-grade starch, glucose, maltose and fructose. The facility was commissioned by President Yoweri Museveni on 20 November 2025 as part of Uganda’s broader push towards agro-processing and pharmaceutical self-reliance.

The investment has been reported at about US$50 million, while the wider development around the site is envisioned as a much larger agro-industrial and biotechnology ecosystem. The plant is intended to supply inputs to Dei’s pharmaceutical manufacturing activities in Matugga, linking agricultural production in eastern Uganda with pharmaceutical manufacturing near Kampala.

Across Africa, the challenge is increasingly not simply how to produce agricultural commodities, but how to capture more value from them before they leave the continent. Cassava illustrates the opportunity. Instead of being sold primarily as a food crop or processed into relatively low-value products, it can provide starches, sugars and other industrial inputs for food, beverages and pharmaceutical manufacturing.

The Namasagali model therefore represents a potentially important shift: from agriculture as production to agriculture as an industrial input. But turning that vision into sustained production has exposed another reality facing African industrialisationmanufacturing requires infrastructure capable of supporting it.

Recent reporting indicates that the plant has struggled to operate at full capacity because of inadequate electricity supply. The facility requires more than 5 megawatts of power to operate at full capacity, according to Dei BioPharma founder Dr Matthias Magoola. The company has reportedly been forced to rely on diesel generators, with one generator costing about Sh15 million a day to operate a shift. Production has consequently been intermittent rather than running at the plant’s designed capacity.

The Energy Minister, Dr Monica Musenero, recently visited the facility and directed the Uganda Electricity Distribution Company Limited to address the infrastructure constraints. UEDCL reportedly committed to upgrading the electricity infrastructure serving the plant.

For Uganda, this is more than a problem affecting one factory. It illustrates the infrastructure equation behind industrial policy. A country can have fertile land, farmers, investors, technology and markets. But if electricity cannot reliably reach an industrial facility, production costs rise and investment potential remains constrained.

The plant requires a large and consistent supply of cassava. Dei BioPharma says it is sourcing from farmers in several parts of Uganda, including Teso, Arua, Gulu, Lira and Bukedea. Full-scale operations are expected to create a significant additional market for cassava producers.

The company’s wider project has also involved registering farmers and providing improved planting materials, according to company information.

A factory alone does not transform an economy. The transformation occurs when farmers have a reliable market, processors have dependable raw materials, manufacturers have competitive inputs, workers gain employment, and consumers gain access to locally produced goods.

Africa’s industrial challenge is often described in terms of manufacturing capacity. But Namasagali suggests that the question is broader. Can African economies connect farmers, infrastructure, processing, science, finance, manufacturing and markets into a single productive ecosystem?

Uganda’s plant is attempting precisely that, Cassava grown by farmers can become pharmaceutical-grade starch and industrial sugars; those inputs can feed manufacturing; manufacturing can reduce dependence on imported materials and potentially create products for regional and global markets.

Uganda’s government has presented the investment as part of a wider effort to reduce dependence on imported pharmaceutical raw materials. The ambition therefore extends beyond cassava, It is about whether an African agricultural commodity can become part of an African industrial supply chain.

The Namasagali experience also carries a cautionary message, Africa does not lack agricultural resources or ambitious industrial projects. The harder task is building the systems that allow those investments to operate consistently and competitively.

Reliable electricity is one part. Others include farmer aggregation, roads, storage, finance, technology, quality standards, skills, research and access to markets. If those pieces come together, a crop such as cassava can become more than food security. It can become an industrial resource.

If they remain disconnected, even a modern factory can spend more time waiting for inputs or electricity than producing. That is why Namasagali matters beyond Kamuli, the plant is ultimately a test of whether Uganda and Africa more broadly can move from exporting potential to manufacturing value.

For Africa, the strategic prize is not simply producing more cassava. It is producing more starch, medicines, technologies, jobs, intellectual property and industrial value from African resources. That is the deeper promise of agro-industrialisation and in Namasagali, that promise is now being tested one tonne, one farmer and one megawatt at a time.

PARIS — Uganda concluded a high-impact participation at IFTM Top Resa 2026, France’s leading B2B tourism fair, securing firm business commitments for 2027–2028 while advancing plans for direct Uganda Airlines flights between Entebbe and Paris by June 2027.

Held at Paris Expo Porte de Versailles from 15–17 September, the fair brought together more than 34,000 tourism professionals, 1,700 brands and 1,200 international buyers, ranking among Europe’s major travel trade platforms alongside ITB Berlin, WTM London and FITUR Madrid.

Uganda’s participation was coordinated by the Embassy of Uganda in Paris under the Economic and Commercial Diplomacy Programme, in partnership with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities, and Uganda Tourism Board. It was Uganda’s third consecutive participation and was led by H.E. Amb. Doreen Ruth Amule and Hon. Susan Nakawuki, Minister of State for Tourism.

The commercial drive was led by 11 private Destination Marketing Companies, more than double the five that participated in 2025. The companies held an average of 18–22 scheduled B2B meetings with buyers from France, Spain, Portugal and Benelux, with discussions moving from general interest to rates, allotments and gorilla permit allocations.

Demand was strongest for gorilla tracking in Bwindi and Mgahinga, Big Five safaris, Rwenzori trekking, Nile adventures and birding. Uganda’s tourism offer was further supported by new hospitality investments, including Marriott Kampala, Erebero Hills and Namoni Lodge.

Uganda welcomed 1,642,215 visitors in 2025, generating USD 1.62 billion in tourism receipts. France emerged as a high-value priority market, recording 7,439 visitors in 2025, more than double the previous year, with average spending above USD 2,025 and stays of 8–15 nights.

Uganda’s visibility was also boosted by a citywide campaign featuring three fully branded Uganda buses operating along major Paris corridors, including the Eiffel Tower, Champs-Élysées, Opera and Montparnasse. The campaign generated an estimated eight million impressions.

Air connectivity emerged as a key constraint, with more than 90% of French and Iberian buyers reportedly identifying the lack of direct Paris–Entebbe flights as a cost and time barrier. Government is therefore advancing plans for Uganda Airlines to introduce direct Paris service by June 2027.

The proposed route also aligns with Uganda’s wider investment and tourism diplomacy. France was Uganda’s leading source of FDI in 2023, with more than USD 1.6 billion in inflows, according to the figures presented at the fair. Paris also offers a strategic hub for travellers from Spain and Portugal.

Confidence in Uganda’s tourism market was further strengthened following the WHO declaration ending the Ebola outbreak in late August and the subsequent lifting of travel advisories.

As the pavilion closed, the message from Uganda’s private sector was clear: “We came as 11 small companies, we left as Team Uganda.”

Addis Ababa, Ethiopia —Uganda has called for sustained follow-up on financing for development and the implementation of the Sevilla commitments, urging stronger coordination among African institutions and continued engagement with international financial institutions to ensure that development priorities translate into tangible economic outcomes.

Uganda’s Permanent Representative to the African Union and the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (ECA), H.E. Ambassador Rebecca Amuge Otengo, made the call during a high-level briefing convened by ECA Executive Secretary Dr. Claver Gatete for African Ambassadors and Permanent Representatives in Addis Ababa.

The briefing brought together members of the diplomatic community to examine pressing continental economic and development priorities and to discuss how ECA can continue supporting African Member States through policy, technical and analytical assistance. At the centre of Uganda’s intervention was a call for consistent follow-up rather than one-off discussions on the commitments emerging from the global financing-for-development process.

Ambassador Otengo emphasised the need for regular briefings and structured monitoring of progress on financing for development and implementation of the Sevilla commitments. She also highlighted the pivotal role ECA can play in engaging international financial institutions, including the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, to ensure that Africa’s development priorities remain central to international financing discussions.

For Uganda, the financing challenge cannot be addressed through a single source of capital. Domestic resource mobilisation remains important, but Ambassador Otengo stressed that it must be supported by stronger economic growth and increased productive capacity capable of generating the resources required for long-term development. The position reflects a broader development challenge facing many African economies: mobilising more domestic resources while simultaneously creating the productive base needed to expand revenues, investment and employment.

The discussions also addressed Africa’s continuing debt challenges and proposals for greater coordination among borrowing countries. Uganda expressed support for the proposed Borrowers’ Club, including the establishment of an African chapter. The proposed platform could provide African countries with an avenue to coordinate positions, exchange experiences and strengthen collective engagement on debt and international financial reform. For Uganda, however, such an initiative should be closely connected to the emerging African Common Position on Debt.

Ambassador Otengo called for close cooperation between the ECA and the African Union Commission in taking the initiative forward. The emphasis on coordination reflects the growing importance of collective African positions in international discussions on debt sustainability, financing conditions and the architecture of global development finance.

The ECA briefing was designed to strengthen dialogue between the Commission and African diplomatic missions while providing Member States with updates on priority economic and development issues. Presentations by ECA officials were followed by an interactive exchange with Ambassadors and Permanent Representatives. Among the issues discussed were:

  • financing for development;
  • implementation of the Sevilla commitments;
  • domestic resource mobilisation;
  • Africa’s debt challenges;
  • the proposed Borrowers’ Club;
  • economic transformation;
  • sustainable development; and
  • ECA’s technical and analytical support to Member States.

For African governments, the challenge is increasingly not only securing commitments but ensuring that those commitments are translated into financing, productive investment and measurable development outcomes.

Responding to the concerns raised by Member States, ECA Executive Secretary Dr. Claver Gatete reaffirmed the Commission’s readiness to work closely with African governments. The Commission indicated that it would continue providing tailored technical support aligned with national development priorities.

The engagement also reinforced the importance of maintaining regular communication between ECA and the diplomatic community. For Member States, such dialogue provides an opportunity to communicate national priorities while also shaping continental policy discussions around issues that affect Africa’s economic transformation.

Africa’s development financing challenge extends beyond the question of how much money can be mobilised. It also concerns the terms on which financing is obtained, the capacity of economies to generate domestic resources, the sustainability of public debt, investment in productive sectors and the ability of countries to convert financing into economic transformation.

This makes institutional coordination increasingly important, at the continental level, the ECA and African Union Commission have complementary roles in policy coordination and technical support, while national governments remain responsible for translating continental commitments into national development programmes. International financial institutions, meanwhile, remain important sources of financing, technical assistance and policy engagement. Uganda’s intervention therefore points towards a broader approach: stronger domestic capacity, better continental coordination and sustained engagement with international financial institutions.

The Addis Ababa briefing comes against a backdrop of continuing discussions over how African countries can secure adequate and sustainable financing for development while managing debt pressures and strengthening domestic resource mobilisation.

Uganda’s position places emphasis on maintaining momentum after international commitments are made. The call for regular follow-up seeks to ensure that commitments such as those associated with Sevilla remain connected to implementation, monitoring and accountability. The proposed African chapter of the Borrowers’ Club also reflects Uganda’s support for greater coordination among African borrowing countries, particularly when discussing debt and reforms to the international financial system.

The discussions in Addis Ababa underline a central issue for Africa’s development agenda: commitments matter, but implementation determines their impact. For Uganda, this means maintaining engagement with continental institutions, strengthening domestic productive capacity, mobilising domestic resources and participating actively in discussions on international financing and debt.

For ECA, it means continuing to provide the policy analysis, technical assistance and convening role required by Member States and for African countries collectively, it means finding mechanisms through which national priorities can be translated into stronger continental positions and more effective engagement with the international financial system.

The message from Uganda’s delegation was therefore clear: financing for development requires sustained follow-up, stronger coordination and a continued focus on implementation. As Africa pursues economic transformation and sustainable development, the effectiveness of these mechanisms will ultimately be measured not by the number of commitments made, but by the extent to which they support investment, productive capacity, resilience and improved development outcomes across the continent.

KAMPALA, UGANDA | Uganda is hosting a three-day High-Level Policy Dialogue on the domestication and implementation of the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) Kampala Declaration and the CAADP Strategy and Action Plan 2026–2035, bringing together senior government officials, the African Union Commission and representatives of Ministries, Departments and Agencies to address one of the continent’s most consequential development questions: how to turn agricultural commitments into investment, productive value chains and measurable improvements in livelihoods.

The dialogue, taking place from 9–11 September 2026, comes at a time when food security, climate resilience, agricultural productivity and access to markets have become increasingly central to Africa’s economic and strategic priorities.

Rather than treating agriculture solely as a domestic production issue, the Kampala discussions have placed it within a wider framework encompassing industrialisation, trade, investment, science and technology, employment, regional integration and international economic engagement.

The meeting builds on Uganda’s hosting of the Extraordinary African Union Summit in January 2025, which adopted the Kampala CAADP Declaration on Building Resilient and Sustainable Agri-Food Systems in Africa, together with the continental Strategy and Action Plan for 2026–2035.

The framework places emphasis on sustainable food production and agro-industrialisation, investment and financing, food and nutrition security, inclusive livelihoods, resilience and stronger agricultural governance. For Uganda, the immediate challenge is not the creation of another policy framework, but ensuring that continental commitments are integrated into existing national development priorities and translated into implementation.

Speaking at the dialogue, Hon. Lt. Col. (Rtd) Bright Rwamirama, State Minister for Animal Industry, said Uganda’s task was to convert its agricultural potential into higher household incomes, employment, food and nutrition security, competitive agro-industries, increased exports and resilient livelihoods.

He explained that implementation would be anchored in Uganda Vision 2040, NDP IV, the NRM Manifesto 2026–2031 and the Agro-Industrialisation Programme Implementation Action Plan (NASIP) rather than establishing a parallel policy architecture.

Among the priorities highlighted were quality seed and planting materials, mechanisation, irrigation, sustainable land management, post-harvest handling and value addition, quality assurance, market access, disease control, fisheries, commercial farming partnerships and stronger agricultural extension and farmer education.

The approach reflects a broader shift in African agricultural policy: moving beyond the question of how much food is produced towards how agricultural production can generate income, employment, industrial capacity and internationally competitive enterprises. That transition is particularly important for economies where millions of livelihoods remain connected to agriculture, while farmers and agribusinesses continue to face constraints related to finance, technology, infrastructure, market access and post-harvest losses.

The connection between agriculture and industrialisation was reinforced by Hon. Sanjay Tanna, Minister of Trade, Industry and Cooperatives, who emphasised that sustaining agricultural growth would require Uganda to move further from production towards processing, value addition, branding, market positioning and export development. He pointed to opportunities across value chains including milk, coffee, tea, honey, shea butter and fruits, stressing the importance of connecting production to international markets.

Africa has considerable agricultural potential, but the economic benefits of agricultural production depend increasingly on what happens after the farm gate. Processing, packaging, standards, logistics, branding, financing and market access determine whether agricultural commodities remain low-value exports or become competitive products capable of supporting industrial development. The Kampala dialogue therefore placed agro-industrialisation alongside food security as a strategic development objective. For Uganda, this also presents an opportunity to deepen the relationship between agricultural transformation and Economic and Commercial Diplomacy.

Agriculture may begin at the farm, but its economic journey increasingly crosses borders. Ugandan diplomatic missions abroad can play a greater role in generating market intelligence, identifying potential buyers, facilitating business-to-business relationships, promoting investment opportunities and supporting Ugandan companies seeking entry into regional and international value chains.

This gives foreign policy a practical economic function: helping connect domestic productive capacity with external markets, capital, technology and expertise. The same logic extends to continental integration. Agricultural transformation requires more than producing competitive goods. Farmers and businesses also need predictable markets, efficient transport systems, appropriate standards and the ability to move products across borders.

The Kampala dialogue therefore linked agricultural policy with regional trade and Africa’s broader economic integration agenda. It also reinforces Uganda’s 4ATMS framework Agriculture, Tourism, Minerals and Science, Technology and Innovation as complementary pillars of international economic engagement.

H.E. Moses Vilakati, AU Commissioner for Agriculture, Rural Development, Blue Economy and Sustainable Environment, called for collective action to move the Kampala Declaration from commitments towards implementation and measurable results. His presentation highlighted both opportunities and challenges surrounding agricultural productivity, food security, investment, irrigation, processing, markets, intra-African trade and youth employment.

A central requirement identified was the development of bankable projects capable of attracting investment at scale. That emphasis is significant because Africa’s agricultural transformation challenge is not simply one of policy formulation. It is also a financing and implementation challenge.

Declarations establish political direction. Strategies establish priorities. But transformation ultimately depends on projects, institutions, financing, technology, skills, infrastructure and accountable implementation. The test for the CAADP Strategy and Action Plan 2026–2035 will therefore be whether continental commitments can increasingly be translated into programmes and investments that farmers, businesses and communities can experience in practical terms.

The agricultural discussions were complemented by a courtesy call by Commissioner Vilakati on Hon. Kyeyune Haruna Kasolo, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs in charge of Regional Cooperation. During the engagement, Commissioner Vilakati commended Uganda for hosting the high-level dialogue and emphasised the importance of stronger continental cooperation in supporting farmers through improved access to fertiliser, extension services, climate-smart agriculture, technology and markets.

Hon. Kasolo congratulated Commissioner Vilakati on his appointment and reaffirmed Uganda’s commitment to supporting farmers across the value chain from grassroots production to export markets. The Minister also underscored the importance of facilitating the movement of agricultural products, expanding market access and strengthening regional trade. He further reaffirmed the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ role in coordinating and nurturing the relationship between the Government of Uganda and the African Union in implementing the CAADP Kampala Declaration.

The engagement illustrated an increasingly important reality in contemporary development diplomacy: foreign policy and domestic economic transformation can no longer operate as separate policy conversations.

The first day of the dialogue concluded with a field visit to the National Agricultural Research Organisation (NARO), including the National Crop Resources Research Institute at Namulonge and the National Livestock Resources Research Institute at Nakyesasa. The visit provided an opportunity to showcase Uganda’s agricultural research, innovation and technology capabilities. It also highlighted the potential for stronger partnerships in research, technology transfer, skills development and commercialisation.

For Africa, this dimension may prove increasingly important, the future of agriculture will be shaped not only by land and labour, but also by science, biotechnology, digital technologies, climate-smart production, improved genetics, irrigation, data, mechanisation and knowledge transfer. Research institutions therefore have a role extending beyond laboratories. Their discoveries must increasingly find pathways into farms, enterprises and markets. This is where the relationship between science, investment, agriculture and diplomacy becomes particularly relevant.

Representing Uganda’s Embassy in Addis Ababa, Minister Counsellor Margreet Kafeero, on behalf of H.E. Ambassador Rebecca Amuge Otengo, highlighted the relevance of the Commissioner’s interventions to Uganda’s 4ATMS and Economic and Commercial Diplomacy priorities. The observation points to a potentially broader role for diplomatic missions: becoming more active connectors between Uganda’s productive sectors and continental and international economic opportunities.

Such diplomacy can involve market intelligence, investment promotion, technology partnerships, commercial networking, export promotion and facilitating relationships between Ugandan enterprises and foreign investors or buyers. In this model, diplomacy does not replace domestic production or private enterprise. Rather, it helps create the external relationships through which domestic capabilities can access wider opportunities.

The significance of the Kampala dialogue extends beyond Uganda, Africa’s agricultural future has implications for global food markets, trade, employment, climate resilience, investment and development.

With a rapidly growing population and increasing urbanisation, the continent faces the simultaneous challenge of producing more food, creating jobs for young people, protecting natural resources and building competitive industries.

That requires a shift from viewing agriculture principally as a subsistence sector towards understanding it as part of a wider economic system connecting farmers, researchers, financiers, manufacturers, traders, logistics providers, consumers and governments.

The CAADP framework provides a continental platform for pursuing that transition.

But the effectiveness of the framework will ultimately depend on implementation at national and regional levels.

The message emerging from Uganda’s three-day dialogue is therefore straightforward but consequential. The Kampala Declaration cannot remain only a continental commitment, It must move from commitment to implementation; from implementation to measurable results; and from measurable results to improved livelihoods.

For Uganda, that means bringing agriculture, trade, investment, science and technology, regional cooperation and diplomacy into a more coherent economic transformation agenda.

It means producing more competitively, processing more domestically, connecting farmers to markets, attracting investment, strengthening research and innovation, improving regional trade and using diplomatic networks to open doors for Ugandan enterprises.

For Africa more broadly, the challenge is similar, the continent possesses land, labour, markets, entrepreneurial energy and considerable agricultural potential. The strategic question is whether these assets can be connected through investment, technology, infrastructure, regional markets and effective institutions to generate higher-value economic activity.

The Kampala dialogue has provided another opportunity to define that ambition.

The harder task and the one that will determine the legacy of the CAADP Strategy and Action Plan 2026–2035 will be turning the ambition into results that can be measured not only in policy documents, but in farm incomes, jobs, food security, exports, enterprises and more resilient African communities.

 

Fort Portal, UGANDA — In Tooro, the passing of a King is more than the departure of an individual. It is a moment when history, memory, identity and tradition converge. On Thursday, 27 August 2026, the people of Tooro received the news that His Majesty Omukama Oyo Nyimba Kabamba Iguru Rukidi IV had died at approximately 10:00 p.m. The announcement by the Prime Minister of Tooro Kingdom, Rt. Hon. Calvin Armstrong Rwomiire Akiiki, described the loss as immeasurable for the Royal Family, the people of Tooro and Uganda.“Omukama Atulize. Enkuba Etutire.” In the passing of Omukama Oyo Nyimba Kabamba Iguru Rukidi IV, Tooro mourns a King, remembers a generation and reflects on the enduring heritage of the Batooro

The words carry the solemnity of a Kingdom in mourning, yet beneath the grief lies another enduring reality: the institution of Tooro is larger than any one reign. The Crown continues. The traditions continue. The clans continue. The language continues. The stories continue to be told and through them, a people continue to understand who they are.

King Oyo was born on 16 April 1992 and ascended the Tooro throne on 12 September 1995, at only three years of age, following the death of his father, Omukama Patrick David Matthew Kaboyo Olimi III. His accession made him one of the world’s youngest monarchs and placed the ancient institution of the Tooro monarchy in the international spotlight. He subsequently grew from a child King into an adult cultural leader whose reign became one of the defining chapters in the modern history of the Kingdom.

For many Ugandans, particularly those who grew up during the late 1990s and 2000s, King Oyo was more than a traditional ruler. He was part of their own lifetime, His image was familiar far beyond Tooro — a young monarch growing into his responsibilities while carrying an institution whose history stretches back generations. His death at 34 therefore closes an unusually long chapter of contemporary African royal history but it also opens a moment of reflection.

  • What does a traditional kingdom mean in modern Africa?
  • What happens when ancient institutions encounter a rapidly changing world?

And how can cultural heritage remain relevant to generations increasingly shaped by technology, migration, urbanisation and globalisation?

Tooro’s answer lies partly in its ability to preserve its identity while allowing that identity to evolve. Tooro occupies a remarkable part of western Uganda, Its cultural heart is Fort Portal City, while the wider Kingdom encompasses areas including Kabarole, Bunyangabu, Kamwenge, Kitagwenda, Kyenjojo, Kyegegwa and Ntoroko. It is a landscape of rolling hills, fertile agricultural land, crater lakes, forests and the dramatic presence of the Rwenzori Mountains. Here, geography and culture are closely connected.

  • The landscape is not merely scenery.
  • It forms part of the memory of the people.

The hills, rivers, forests, farms, royal sites, clan territories and cultural spaces all contribute to a sense of belonging that has been passed from one generation to another. At the centre of this cultural landscape stands Karuziika Palace, an important symbol of the Tooro monarchy and the continuity of the Kingdom. The palace is more than a royal residence, it represents an institution through which generations of Batooro have connected the present with the past.

The history of Tooro reaches into the broader historical traditions of the Great Lakes region. Tooro’s own historical narrative connects the Kingdom to the ancient traditions associated with Kitara, including the Batembuzi, Bachwezi and Babiito dynasties. Much of the early history is preserved through oral tradition, clan memory, cultural practices and stories transmitted across generations.

The modern Kingdom emerged as an independent kingdom in the nineteenth century under Rukirabasaija Kaboyo Omuhundwa Kasusunkwanzi Olimi I, who is recognised as its first Omukama. The Kingdom later experienced periods of political change and conflict before its independence was re-established in 1891 under Omukama Daudi Kasagama Kyebambe IV. Like other traditional institutions in Uganda, Tooro experienced a profound rupture in 1967 when the country’s kingdoms were abolished.

The restoration of traditional kingdoms in 1993 reopened a new chapter, for Tooro, restoration was not simply the return of a royal title. It represented the revival of cultural institutions, traditions and a recognised space through which the Batooro could continue expressing their collective identity. The Kingdom today describes itself as a cultural institution committed to unity, cultural pride, heritage preservation and sustainable development.

The people of Tooro are known as the Batooro, while an individual is a Mutooro, their language, Rutooro, is one of the strongest vessels of cultural memory. A language carries more than words, it carries ways of greeting, expressions of respect, family relationships, humour, history, values and a people’s understanding of the world. For the Batooro, cultural identity is similarly expressed through family, community, clan, music, dance, ceremonies, oral history, traditional knowledge and hospitality.

Historically, agriculture and cattle keeping played important roles in the livelihoods of communities across Tooro. Crops including bananas, millet, sweet potatoes, sorghum, peas and vegetables formed part of traditional food systems, alongside livestock products such as milk, meat, butter and ghee. These were not simply economic activities, they were woven into social life, family relations and community cooperation.

One of the most important foundations of Tooro society is the clan, for many Batooro, knowing one’s clan is knowing part of one’s history. Clan identity establishes relationships between families and connects individuals to an ancestry that reaches beyond their immediate household. Traditionally, clan elders have played important roles as custodians of family history, advisers and mediators. They helped transmit knowledge from one generation to another at a time when much of African history was preserved not in written archives but through people.

 

In this sense, the clan is itself an archive, its stories, names, relationships and traditions constitute a living record of the community. This is why cultural preservation cannot be reduced to monuments and museums alone. A culture survives when people continue to speak its language, tell its stories, observe its traditions and teach its values to their children.

In Tooro culture, names can carry profound meaning, a name may reflect circumstances surrounding a child’s birth, family history or an event remembered by the household. Traditionally, elders have participated in naming children, making the process part of a wider system of family and cultural transmission.

The arrival of Christianity and Islam introduced additional naming practices, with many families adopting religious names alongside their traditional Rutooro names. The coexistence of these traditions illustrates an important feature of African culture: heritage is rarely static. The traditions surrounding twins and children born after twins also demonstrate the richness of the naming system, with particular names carrying meanings associated with birth order and family circumstances. Such traditions may appear simple on the surface, but they provide a cultural vocabulary through which communities interpret life, family and belonging.

The Omukama does not exercise political power in Uganda’s constitutional system, the significance of the institution is fundamentally cultural. The King serves as a symbol of unity, identity and continuity among the Batooro. That role becomes particularly important during moments of uncertainty or collective celebration. The institution provides a focal point around which people can gather as a community.

For a society living within a modern republic, with citizens participating in national politics, global markets, digital platforms and international institutions, the Kingdom provides another dimension of identity  one rooted in history and culture. This dual identity is not necessarily contradictory, a person can be simultaneously a Mutooro, a Ugandan and an African citizen of an increasingly interconnected world. Indeed, cultural institutions can help people navigate globalisation without losing their sense of place.

King Oyo inherited the Crown as a child and grew into it before a global audience. His reign coincided with a period in which traditional leadership itself was being reimagined. Young people became increasingly central to conversations about development, entrepreneurship, education, technology, climate action and cultural preservation. The King was associated with efforts touching on areas including youth empowerment, education, environmental conservation, health and tourism. Uganda’s public institutions have also recognised his contribution to the preservation of Tooro’s heritage and his role as a cultural leader.

His public image also extended beyond the cultural sphere, He was known for his interest in sport and was particularly associated with football in Tooro and Uganda. The Federation of Uganda Football Associations described him as a supporter of the Uganda Cranes, the Tooro Kingdom Amasaza Cup and the FUFA Drum, a competition designed to celebrate Uganda’s cultural diversity through football. This intersection of culture, youth and sport reflected a broader reality. Traditional institutions do not have to remain frozen in the past. They can become platforms through which heritage engages with contemporary society.

The strongest cultural institutions are not simply those that preserve the past.They are those capable of making the past meaningful to the future. Tooro has enormous potential in this regard, its cultural heritage intersects naturally with tourism, education, creative industries, environmental conservation, agriculture, research and the growing global interest in African history and identity.

The Rwenzori landscape, crater lakes, forests, royal heritage, traditional knowledge, music, dance, language, food and oral traditions together create an extraordinary cultural ecosystem. For Uganda’s tourism and creative economy, Tooro’s heritage is therefore not merely something to remember. It is an asset for young people, it can become a source of knowledge, creativity, employment and innovation. For researchers, it provides an important field for documenting African history and indigenous knowledge. For the international community, it offers an opportunity to encounter Africa through the lived experiences of its communities rather than solely through externally constructed narratives and for the Batooro themselves, it remains a source of identity.

In announcing King Oyo’s death, the Prime Minister of Tooro Kingdom also stated that the continuity of the Crown was assured and that the late King had left behind a Prince whose identity would be formally revealed at the appropriate time in accordance with Tooro traditions and customs. That statement carries significance beyond succession, it reflects one of the central characteristics of traditional institutions: continuity.

Kings come and go. Generations change. Political systems evolve but institutions survive when societies continue to attach meaning to them. The current period of mourning is therefore both an ending and a beginning. The Batooro are grieving the King they knew, at the same time, they are preparing to welcome the next chapter of an institution that has survived political upheaval, abolition, restoration and profound social change.

Uganda is now preparing to give King Oyo an official final farewell. The Government has announced state-supported burial arrangements, while national leaders and institutions have joined the Royal Family and the people of Tooro in mourning but the most enduring tribute may not be found in the ceremonies surrounding his burial.

  • It may be found in what happens afterwards.
  • Will the language continue to flourish?
  • Will young Batooro learn the histories of their clans?
  • Will traditional knowledge be documented?

Will cultural sites be preserved? Will the Kingdom’s heritage contribute to responsible tourism and sustainable development? Will young people see culture not as something belonging only to their grandparents, but as something capable of shaping their own future? These are questions that extend beyond the life of one King. They belong to the future of Tooro.

The story of Tooro is ultimately not only the story of its Abakama, It is the story of its people. It is carried by grandparents who remember old stories, parents who teach their children Rutooro, elders who preserve clan histories, artists who perform traditional music, farmers who maintain generations-old practices, young people who reinterpret heritage through new media and communities that continue to gather around shared identity.

King Oyo’s reign became part of that story, His extraordinary accession at the age of three attracted international attention. His adulthood gave him an opportunity to redefine that childhood image through service and cultural leadership. His death at 34 has brought a generation face-to-face with the fragility of life and the durability of institutions.

His Majesty Omukama Oyo Nyimba Kabamba Iguru Rukidi IV will be remembered as a King whose extraordinary journey began in childhood and unfolded before the eyes of Uganda and the world. He inherited a centuries-old institution at an age when most children were only beginning to understand the world around them.

He grew into a symbol of Tooro’s continuity, identity and cultural pride. His passing is a profound loss to the Royal Family, the Batooro and Uganda but the most powerful expression of his legacy may be found in the continued strength of the people and culture he represented.

As Tooro mourns, it also remembers, as it remembers, it preserves and as it preserves, it prepares to pass its heritage to another generation. “The King has passed. The Kingdom remains. The people remain. The language remains. The stories remain.” This feature forms part of Daily Thinkers’ Africa Focus and Culture & Heritage coverage, exploring the histories, identities, institutions and living traditions that continue to shape Africa.

Omukama Atulize. Enkuba Etutire.