October 6, 2026

Editor

Daily Thinkers is a digital news and analysis platform dedicated to thoughtful journalism and informed perspectives on global affairs. We cover diplomacy, real-estate, investment, economics, sports, governance, international relations, policy, development, and social issues with a strong emphasis on context, constructive, and credibility. In a fast-paced media environment, Daily Thinkers focuses on insight rather than immediacy, offering readers analysis that explains not only what is happening, but why it matters. Our content is designed for a global audience that values clarity, reasoned debate, and responsible reporting. With contributors drawn from journalism, academia, public policy, think tankers and diplomacy. Daily Thinkers serves as a bridge between information and understanding, particularly highlighting Africa’s evolving role within global conversations.

Kampala,— Uganda is reviving a national patriotism and ideological training programme for Senior Six graduates, with all students completing their secondary education this year expected to undergo training at the National Leadership Institute (NALI), Kyankwanzi. The programme is intended to expose young people to questions of national identity, patriotism, discipline, leadership, citizenship and responsibility, as they transition from secondary education into university, vocational training, employment and other forms of national service.

The idea of using organised ideological and civic education to shape national consciousness has deep roots across Africa. During the continent’s liberation struggles, education was often understood not simply as preparation for employment but as a means of cultivating political consciousness, collective identity and responsibility to society.

Across post-independence Africa, governments similarly experimented with forms of national service, civic education, youth mobilisation and leadership training. Countries including Tanzania, Zambia, Ghana and Mozambique developed programmes that sought, in different ways and under different political circumstances, to connect education with citizenship, nation-building and social responsibility.

Tanzania’s 1967 Arusha Declaration era, for example, placed considerable emphasis on education for self-reliance and the development of citizens committed to national development. In Zambia, national youth and civic programmes emerged within the broader post-independence effort to construct a cohesive national identity from a society with diverse communities and colonial-era institutional legacies.

Uganda’s own experience must be understood within this wider African history, Following independence in 1962, the country faced the challenge of building a shared national identity from diverse communities shaped by pre-colonial political systems, colonial administration and different educational and religious traditions. The question of how to cultivate responsible citizens therefore became intertwined with the broader project of nation-building.

The National Leadership Institute at Kyankwanzi emerged within this longer history of political and leadership education in Uganda. Over the years, the institute has been associated with leadership development, ideological education and national consciousness, particularly among political leaders, public officials and other organised groups.

The renewed programme for Senior Six graduates extends that approach to a much younger generation. Its significance therefore goes beyond a holiday programme. At a time when African societies are experiencing rapid demographic growth, digital transformation, unemployment pressures, migration and changing ideas of citizenship, governments across the continent are increasingly confronted with the question of how young people should be prepared not only for the labour market, but also for participation in national life. Uganda’s programme places that question directly within the transition between secondary education and adulthood.

Africa is the world’s youngest continent, making the relationship between youth and nation-building particularly consequential. Young Africans are simultaneously consumers of global information and products, participants in local communities and potential contributors to national economies. This creates both opportunities and policy challenges.

Patriotism education can provide young people with knowledge of their country’s history, institutions, responsibilities and place within Africa and the international system. But its long-term value depends on whether it becomes a credible civic education framework—one that encourages informed citizenship, ethical leadership, respect for diversity, critical thinking and responsibility alongside patriotism.

That distinction matters historically, Across Africa, programmes described as ideological or patriotic education have produced different experiences. Some have contributed to national mobilisation and social cohesion; others have attracted debate over political neutrality, freedom of thought and the boundaries between civic education and political indoctrination. Uganda’s renewed programme therefore enters an already established continental conversation: How can African states cultivate patriotism without narrowing the space for independent thought?

For the Senior Six graduates participating in the programme, Kyankwanzi will represent a transition from the classroom into a broader conversation about citizenship. The programme’s stated emphasis on discipline, patriotism, national identity and responsibility places the young people at the centre of a larger national-development question: what kind of citizens does Uganda need as it pursues economic transformation and deeper integration into regional and continental markets?

The answer cannot rest on ideological instruction alone, It also requires young people to understand Uganda’s history, appreciate its cultural and social diversity, recognise their responsibilities under the Constitution and law, understand Africa’s place in global affairs and acquire the ethical and practical leadership skills needed to contribute to their communities.

In that sense, the revival of patriotism training at Kyankwanzi reconnects Uganda with a much older African idea: that nation-building is ultimately a project of people, not institutions alone. For a continent undergoing profound demographic, economic and geopolitical change, the education of its young citizens remains one of the most consequential investments a state can make.

 

Addis Ababa,— Ethiopia has reaffirmed what it describes as its legitimate strategic interests in the management of the Abay River, commonly known as the Blue Nile, and in the evolving security and maritime architecture of the Red Sea, calling for regional disputes to be addressed through dialogue, mutual respect and good-neighbourly relations.

In a statement issued on Monday, Ethiopia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs stressed that any discussion concerning the utilisation and management of the Abay River must take into account Ethiopia’s geographic position as the source of the river.

The Ministry noted that virtually all of the Blue Nile originates in the Ethiopian highlands and that the Abay contributes approximately 85 percent of the Nile River’s total flow. It argued that these geographic realities should form part of the basis for discussions on the river’s utilisation and management.

The statement also placed Ethiopia’s Red Sea interests within a broader geographic and historical context. According to the Ministry, changes in political boundaries over time have not eliminated Ethiopia’s longstanding geographic and historical connection to the Red Sea. It noted that Ethiopia’s nearest border lies approximately 30 miles from the coast and maintained that this proximity gives the country a legitimate interest in regional maritime affairs and the emerging security architecture of the Red Sea. “Any serious discussion of regional maritime affairs and security architecture must account for Ethiopia’s legitimate interests and its enduring connection to the Red Sea,” the Ministry stated.

Ethiopia’s position comes amid growing strategic attention to the Red Sea and the wider Horn of Africa, where maritime security, trade routes, territorial sovereignty and access to strategic waterways increasingly intersect with regional security and economic interests.

The Ministry argued that geographic and historical realities cannot be altered through political rhetoric, coercive measures or destabilising actions. It further stated that actions conducted through proxies or acts of aggression would not change Ethiopia’s regional interests or its responsibilities. At the same time, Addis Ababa reiterated that its preferred approach remains peaceful engagement and regional cooperation.

The Ministry affirmed Ethiopia’s readiness to protect its sovereignty, territorial integrity and core national interests, while calling on regional actors to address shared challenges through constructive dialogue rather than confrontation or zero-sum approaches.

Ethiopia’s statement places two strategically significant questions the future management of the Nile system and the evolving security architecture of the Red Sea within a single regional framework. The two issues have implications extending beyond Ethiopia’s immediate neighbourhood. The Nile is central to the livelihoods, agriculture, energy and development priorities of several countries, while the Red Sea connects the Horn of Africa to major international shipping and commercial routes.

For Ethiopia, the Ministry’s latest statement underscores the importance Addis Ababa attaches to ensuring that its geographic position, economic interests and national security considerations are reflected in regional discussions. For neighbouring states and international partners, the challenge remains to reconcile competing national interests while maintaining regional stability, respect for sovereignty and cooperation over shared resources and strategic spaces.

Ethiopia concluded its statement by reiterating its commitment to peaceful engagement and good-neighbourly relations, while maintaining that its sovereignty, territorial integrity and core national interests remain fundamental considerations in any regional framework concerning the Abay River, the Red Sea and the wider Horn of Africa.

 

Beijing,— The Embassy of the Republic of Uganda in Beijing, in collaboration with the Consulate General in Guangzhou, convened the Uganda Diaspora Day Forum at the Shangri-La Hotel, Beijing, as part of activities commemorating the 64th Independence Anniversary of the Republic of Uganda.

The Forum brought together Ugandans residing across the People’s Republic of China, including students, entrepreneurs, businesspersons and professionals. It was attended by senior officials from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Internal Affairs, alongside representatives of Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) and private-sector stakeholders participating virtually from Kampala.

In her remarks, H.E. Oliver Wonekha, the Ambassador of the Republic of Uganda to the People’s Republic of China, underscored the diaspora’s role as an important partner in advancing the Tenfold Growth Strategy and the ATMS transformation agenda Agro-based Industrialisation, Tourism Development, Mineral Development, including Oil and Gas, and Science, Technology and Innovation. Amb. Wonekha encouraged Ugandans in China to maintain regular registration with the Embassy in Beijing and the Consulate General in Guangzhou, seek timely consular guidance and comply with the laws and regulations of the host country. She further noted that Government is considering expanding Uganda’s consular presence to other major Chinese cities.

Mr. Martin Muniera, Interim President of the Ugandan Community in the People’s Republic of China, appreciated the Missions for strengthening engagement with the diaspora. He also raised concern about misinformation surrounding overseas opportunities, which can expose Ugandans to exploitation.

The Forum featured policy and technical briefings covering consular affairs, migration governance, investment, taxation, customs and financial services.

Amb. Evans Aryabaha, Head of Consular Services, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, outlined the range of consular services available to Ugandans abroad and reaffirmed Government’s commitment to their protection and welfare, while encouraging regular engagement through official channels.

Dr. Josephine Ekwang, Commissioner for Inspection and Compliance, Ministry of Internal Affairs, presented the National Immigration Policy 2025 and its implementation framework, highlighting reforms aimed at strengthening migration governance and enhancing the contribution of the diaspora to national development.

Ms. Rita Mugula, Assistant Director, Uganda Investment Authority, highlighted investment opportunities and incentives under the ATMS framework, including facilitation measures available to investors in priority sectors.

Mr. Benedict Kaweesi, Customs Department, Uganda Revenue Authority, provided guidance on taxation and customs procedures, including applicable incentives and exemptions for diaspora investors, as well as measures aimed at improving transparency and trade facilitation.

The financial sector perspective was provided by Ms. Lillian Kefeeza Mutebi of Old Mutual, who presented diaspora-oriented financial solutions for wealth creation and long-term financial planning. Mr. Martin Sseguya, Chief Manager, Personal Banking, Centenary Bank, outlined diaspora banking products that can be accessed remotely, emphasising the importance of formal, secure and cost-effective financial channels.

In his closing remarks, Amb. Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Muheesi, Deputy Head of Mission in Beijing, appreciated the diaspora’s active participation and emphasised the shared responsibility to respect the laws of the host country and project a positive image of Uganda. He encouraged Ugandans in China to remain vigilant, support one another and avoid activities inconsistent with immigration and other applicable regulations. He also urged the diaspora to draw lessons from China’s disciplined and focused approach to transformation.

The engagement provided a structured platform for connecting Uganda’s diaspora capabilities in China with domestic investment opportunities, technology sourcing, skills transfer and enterprise development under the ATMS framework. Follow-up engagement will continue through the Embassy in Beijing, the Consulate General in Guangzhou and designated focal points within participating MDAs and private-sector institutions.

The outcomes of the Forum will contribute to continued programming aimed at mobilising diaspora expertise, capital, networks and innovation in support of the Tenfold Growth Strategy and Uganda’s long-term economic transformation ambitions.

Cairo/Addis Ababa | Egypt and Ethiopia have entered a new diplomatic confrontation after both countries expelled senior diplomatic personnel, adding another layer of tension to a relationship already strained by the long-running dispute over the Nile and Ethiopia’s Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD). The latest escalation unfolded within days of a wider deterioration in Ethiopia’s relations with Eritrea, while renewed fighting in Ethiopia’s northern Tigray region has introduced additional security calculations involving several countries across the Horn of Africa.

Ethiopia first declared Egyptian diplomat Ahmed Moharam Ahmed Soliman persona non grata, giving him 48 hours to leave the country. Addis Ababa did not publicly provide a reason for the decision and said the action was taken under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.

Cairo responded under the principle of reciprocity, declaring an Ethiopian diplomatic counsellor, identified by Egypt’s state news agency MENA as Egazi Emelo Borougi, persona non grata and also giving him 48 hours to depart.

The diplomatic expulsions are significant because they come against a much broader regional backdrop in which relations between Egypt, Ethiopia and Eritrea have increasingly intersected with questions of water security, maritime access, military positioning and political influence.

The immediate confrontation involves two diplomats, its strategic implications, however, extend well beyond the Egyptian and Ethiopian capitals. Ethiopia recently ordered the closure of its embassy in Eritrea and declared 10 Eritrean diplomats persona non grata, accusing them of activities that posed a threat to Ethiopian national security.

Eritrea subsequently announced that it was severing diplomatic relations with Ethiopia, describing the move as a reciprocal response. The developments have therefore created a diplomatic triangle involving Egypt, Ethiopia and Eritrea, with the Nile and the wider security architecture of the Horn of Africa forming overlapping areas of strategic concern.

The African Union Commission has called on all three countries to exercise restraint, maintain communication channels and resolve their differences through diplomatic means. That intervention places the latest confrontation within a broader continental concern: preventing bilateral disputes from becoming interconnected regional crises.

At the heart of Egypt–Ethiopia relations remains the dispute over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, constructed by Ethiopia on the Blue Nile. The Blue Nile is the principal tributary feeding the Nile downstream, and the river is fundamental to Egypt’s water security.

Egypt has repeatedly argued that the operation and filling of the GERD must be governed by a legally binding agreement that protects downstream interests. Ethiopia, meanwhile, maintains that the dam is a sovereign development project intended principally to generate electricity and support economic transformation. The disagreement has persisted for more than a decade despite multiple rounds of negotiations involving Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan. The stakes are unusually high because the dispute combines water, energy, agriculture, food security, sovereignty and regional geopolitics in a single strategic equation.

Egypt has described the Nile as an existential issue. President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi said this week that Cairo was leaving room for diplomacy and peaceful solutions but warned that such diplomacy would not come at the expense of Egypt’s existence and its people. Ethiopia, for its part, has continued to defend its sovereign right to develop its water and energy resources.

The Blue Nile contributes more than 80 percent of the water reaching Egypt, according to the figures cited in reporting on the dispute. Both the Egyptian and Ethiopian diplomats expelled in the latest confrontation were given 48 hours to leave their respective countries.

Ethiopia separately declared 10 Eritrean diplomats persona non grata before the latest diplomatic confrontation with Egypt. These figures do not by themselves determine the trajectory of the crisis. They illustrate, however, how a diplomatic dispute involving individual officials is unfolding alongside much larger questions of water security and regional power.

The geography surrounding the dispute is equally important, Ethiopia is landlocked but sits at the centre of the Horn of Africa, adjacent to the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden strategic environment. Egypt controls the northern end of the Red Sea through the Suez Canal, one of the world’s most important maritime trade corridors.

The Bab el-Mandeb Strait, connecting the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden, is another critical maritime chokepoint. The security of these waterways has implications far beyond the immediate region because they connect European, Middle Eastern, African and Asian trade routes.

Egypt has expanded security and military cooperation with several countries around Ethiopia, including Sudan, Eritrea, Djibouti and Somalia, according to reporting cited in the material surrounding the latest diplomatic developments. At the same time, Ethiopia has maintained a significant security presence in Somalia as part of wider regional counter-insurgency and peace-support efforts. The changing military and diplomatic landscape therefore creates a situation in which water diplomacy, Horn of Africa security and Red Sea geopolitics increasingly overlap.

The latest diplomatic confrontation is also unfolding against renewed fighting in Ethiopia’s northern Tigray region. Ethiopia has accused Eritrea, Sudan and Egypt of supporting an opposition alliance led by the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF). The countries named by Addis Ababa have denied the allegations. These accusations remain contested and should not be treated as independently established facts.

Their diplomatic significance nevertheless lies in what they reveal about the widening security calculations surrounding Ethiopia’s internal conflict. For Addis Ababa, external involvement in domestic security matters represents a national-security concern. For neighbouring and regional states, developments inside Ethiopia can affect border security, refugee movements, trade corridors, water politics and access to the Red Sea. This is where the diplomatic dispute becomes a regional issue.

Diplomatic expulsions are among the more visible instruments available to states when relations deteriorate without formally breaking diplomatic ties. They can serve several purposes: signalling displeasure, responding to perceived interference, creating diplomatic pressure or demonstrating reciprocity. In this case, the sequence is particularly significant.

  • Ethiopia → Egypt: Egyptian diplomat expelled.
  • Egypt → Ethiopia: Ethiopian diplomat expelled in response.
  • Ethiopia → Eritrea: Embassy closure and expulsion of 10 Eritrean diplomats.
  • Eritrea → Ethiopia: Diplomatic relations severed.

The sequence shows how diplomatic measures can rapidly multiply across interconnected relationships. Yet expulsion does not automatically mean that diplomatic dialogue has ended. The Vienna Convention provides a legal framework for diplomatic relations, while states retain the ability to communicate through other official channels even during periods of severe political tension.

The Nile dispute also carries substantial economic consequences, For Egypt, dependence on the Nile intersects directly with agriculture, drinking water and food security. For Ethiopia, the GERD represents a major investment in electricity generation and economic development, with Addis Ababa presenting hydropower as an important component of its development strategy. The disagreement therefore involves two different but interconnected development priorities:

  • Egypt: predictability and security of downstream water flows.
  • Ethiopia: sovereignty over water resources and expanded energy production.
  • Sudan: a downstream position that combines potential benefits from regulated water flows and electricity with concerns over dam safety and coordination.

The challenge for diplomacy is consequently not simply determining who controls water. It is establishing arrangements capable of accommodating development, sovereignty, environmental risk and downstream security simultaneously.

The African Union’s call for restraint is significant because the organisation’s institutional framework places peaceful settlement, dialogue and regional stability at the centre of continental diplomacy. The AU Commission has said it is closely following the heightened tensions and urged Ethiopia, Eritrea and Egypt to avoid actions or statements that could further escalate the situation. It has also indicated its readiness to support de-escalation and dialogue. For the continental organisation, the immediate diplomatic priority is therefore not to determine which state is right in the underlying disputes, but to keep communication open and prevent separate disagreements from becoming mutually reinforcing crises.

The Egypt–Ethiopia confrontation illustrates a wider transformation taking place across the Horn of Africa.

  • Water politics are intersecting with energy security.
  • Domestic conflicts are intersecting with regional alliances.
  • The Nile is intersecting with Red Sea geopolitics.

Diplomatic relations are intersecting with military calculations and national development priorities are increasingly being negotiated within a much more competitive regional environment. The immediate question is whether the latest expulsions remain a limited diplomatic exchange or become part of a broader deterioration in relations. For now, the clearest institutional message has come from the African Union: keep channels of communication open, exercise restraint and pursue diplomatic solutions.

The deeper challenge, however, will require more than managing diplomatic incidents. Egypt, Ethiopia and their regional partners face the longer-term task of developing mechanisms capable of addressing the Nile dispute while insulating broader regional relations from the pressures generated by conflicts and strategic competition in the Horn of Africa.

The global minerals economy is entering a new phase in which access to resources is no longer the only strategic advantage; control of processing and refining capacity is increasingly determining who captures the greatest economic value. UN Trade and Development estimates that global trade in critical minerals reached approximately US$2.5 trillion in 2023, with Asia accounting for more than half of global imports. In 2024, global critical-mineral exports were still about US$2.25 trillion, while Africa exported approximately US$176 billion worth of critical minerals.  Yet the most important statistic may be the value Africa does not capture.

UNCTAD estimates that Africa supplies about 12% of global mineral exports but captures only around 4% of the value in green supply chains.  That gap explains why the global competition around minerals is increasingly moving beyond mining. Africa possesses approximately 48.1% of the world’s cobalt, 47.7% of manganese, 21.6% of natural graphite, 5.9% of copper, 5.6% of nickel and 1% of lithium, according to UNCTAD analysis.

But ownership of deposits does not automatically translate into industrial power. In 2025, the Democratic Republic of Congo accounted for 74% of global cobalt mine production, while China dominated several critical-mineral refining chains and Indonesia accounted for 43% of global nickel refining capacity.  The lesson for Africa is increasingly clear: the strategic value of a mineral is not created at the mine alone. It increases through processing, refining, manufacturing, technology, logistics and the industries built around it.

This is why the debate over mineral wealth is becoming a debate about industrial sovereignty. Africa can remain primarily a supplier of ores and concentrates to factories elsewhere, or use its resource endowment to build domestic and regional value chains.

The economic difference can be substantial. UNCTAD cites the Democratic Republic of Congo’s cobalt experience: local processing increased the mineral’s unit price from approximately US$5.8 per kilogram at extraction to US$16.2 per kilogram after processing. The country’s processed cobalt exports reached about US$6 billion in 2022, compared with approximately US$167 million from raw cobalt ores.  That is the broader significance of Uganda’s mineral-development agenda. Mining creates extraction. Refining creates another layer of value. Manufacturing creates another. And industrial ecosystems create jobs, skills, technology and businesses around the entire chain.

The same principle extends beyond minerals to petroleum, President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni has reiterated Uganda’s commitment to establishing a domestic refinery, describing it as part of a wider strategy to process Uganda’s crude for domestic consumption and supply markets in the interior of Africa. He has also argued that several East African refineries can operate alongside one another if countries coordinate markets, infrastructure and economic interests. This places Uganda’s refinery within a much larger regional industrial equation.

The planned regional refinery network including Uganda’s refinery alongside proposed or developing facilities in Kenya and Tanzania could create opportunities extending beyond petroleum products into petrochemicals, fertiliser, logistics, engineering, storage, manufacturing and specialised services. The Lamu proposal cited in the source material, for example, is designed around a 700,000-barrel-per-day processing capacity and an estimated US$16 billion investment, with intended markets including Uganda, Tanzania, Ethiopia, South Sudan and the DRC.

For Uganda, therefore, the refinery should not be viewed only as a facility that converts crude oil into fuel. It can be understood as a potential industrial anchor—provided it is connected to local suppliers, technical skills, energy infrastructure, logistics, petrochemicals, manufacturing and regional markets. That is particularly important because the International Energy Agency notes that oil refining converts crude into fuels for road transport, shipping and aviation as well as inputs for chemicals and products such as plastics.

The global refining and minerals landscape is changing at the same time, the IEA projects global refined-products demand to peak at 86.3 million barrels per day in 2027, while about 4.2 million barrels per day of new refining capacity is expected to be added globally by 2030, partly offset by approximately 1.6 million barrels per day of closures.  Meanwhile, UNCTAD reports that lithium demand alone could rise by 353% between 2024 and 2040, while graphite demand could increase by more than 130%.

For Africa, these figures point to a strategic window but not an automatic dividend. The opportunity is to move from “Africa has the resources” to “Africa processes, refines and manufactures from its resources.” For Uganda, that means linking the mining sector, oil refining, industrialisation, regional trade and economic diplomacy into one broader value-addition strategy. The message from the Mineral Wealth Conference 2026 therefore extends well beyond the mining sector:

Africa’s next resource advantage may not be what it extracts, but what it learns to process, refine and manufacture and for Uganda, the question is increasingly not simply how much mineral and petroleum wealth the country possesses, but how much of the resulting value, technology, investment and employment can be retained within Uganda and connected to the wider East African market.

KAMPALA,— Uganda’s 15th Annual Mineral Wealth Conference has concluded with a renewed focus on turning the country’s mineral resources into greater industrial value, investment, jobs and regional economic opportunities. Speaking at the close of the conference, Hon. Phiona Nyamutooro, Minister of State for Mineral Development, thanked delegates and stakeholders for their participation and outlined government priorities for transforming the mining sector.

Minerals currently account for about 2.2% of Uganda’s GDP, according to figures highlighted at the conference. The sector’s wider economic significance is also reflected in the country’s mineral production and export ambitions, particularly as Uganda seeks to strengthen geological information, formalise artisanal and small-scale mining, expand value addition and attract responsible investment.

  • The numbers tell part of the story: • 2.2% — minerals’ contribution to Uganda’s GDP, as cited at the conference.
  • 4% — Uganda’s estimated overall GDP growth in FY2025/26, according to UBOS.
  • UGX 68.7 billion — reported value of mineral production in Q3 FY2024/25, representing a 13.8% quarterly increase.
  • US$4.2 billion — the 2026/27 national indicator framework target for the value of refined gold exports, highlighting the scale of ambition around mineral exports and value chains.
  • 1% — increase in the reported aggregate value of mineral production in the latest statistical series presented by UBOS, underscoring significant movement in mineral activity.

At the conference, Minister Nyamutooro emphasised government efforts around licensing, access to financing, formalisation of artisanal and small-scale mining, environmental compliance and mineral value addition.

She also reaffirmed the role of the Uganda National Mining Company in strengthening commercial participation, value addition and partnerships with investors.

Importantly, the Ministry will treat the conference recommendations as a working agenda, with progress expected to be reported at the next edition. Priorities include stronger geological data, improved analytical laboratories, greater Ugandan participation across mineral value chains and responsible mine closure.

Uganda’s High Commissioner to Tanzania, Amb. (Rtd) Col. Fred Mwesigye, commended the Uganda Chamber of Energy and Minerals for convening a platform bringing together stakeholders from Africa and beyond.

Drawing on Uganda–Tanzania experiences, he called for deeper regional cooperation, technology transfer, value addition and shared infrastructure so that Africa’s mineral resources translate into investment, industrialisation and opportunities for its growing youth population.

The central message emerging from the conference is increasingly economic: the question is not simply how much mineral wealth Uganda possesses, but how much value can be retained, processed and multiplied within Uganda and the wider African market.

Fort Portal,— The royal drums of Tooro sounded once again at Karuziika Palace on Tuesday as President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni presided over the coronation of His Majesty Edward Rukidi Nyabongo I, marking the beginning of a new chapter for one of Uganda’s historic cultural institutions.The ceremony followed the death of Omukama Oyo Nyimba Kabamba Iguru Rukidi IV on August 27, 2026, bringing to a close a 31-year reign that began when Oyo inherited the throne at the age of three.

Thousands of Batooro, cultural leaders, religious leaders, government officials, diplomats and guests from across Uganda and beyond gathered at Karuziika Palace in Fort Portal to witness the transition. The coronation followed a thanksgiving service at St John’s Cathedral, led by Bishop Reuben Kisembo, before celebrations moved to the palace, where the return of the royal drums and unveiling of the lion statues symbolised the closing of the mourning period and the restoration of public royal ceremonies but beyond the colour and ceremony, the occasion represented something deeper: the continuity of Tooro’s cultural identity.

Tooro’s history reaches deep into the Great Lakes region and is preserved through royal genealogies, oral traditions, clan institutions, language, music, dance, dress and customary knowledge. According to the Uganda Media Centre, Tooro’s historical narrative traces its royal traditions through the ancient Batembuzi and Bachwezi traditions before the emergence of the Babiito dynasty. The independent Tooro Kingdom emerged around the 1830s under Prince Olimi I, who separated from Bunyoro and established a distinct royal institution. The kingdom later reaffirmed its independence in the nineteenth century under Omukama Kasagama.

The monarchy subsequently navigated the political transformations brought by British colonial rule and Uganda’s post-independence political changes. In 1967, Uganda abolished the traditional kingdoms as political institutions. The traditional institutions were restored in 1993, reopening a new era in which cultural kingdoms could contribute to cultural preservation and social development without exercising constitutional political authority. The Tooro institution therefore carries a history that predates the modern Ugandan state and has survived several major political transformations. The coronation of Nyabongo I becomes part of that longer story of continuity.

For the Batooro, heritage is not confined to royal buildings or ceremonial occasions. It lives in language, names, clan relationships, traditional music, dance, dress, oral history, food, crafts and systems of social organisation. At Karuziika, the sound of the royal drums, the amakondere, the vibrant mushana and busuuti worn by guests, the ululations and the ceremonial unveiling of the lion statues transformed the palace grounds into a living cultural archive. These traditions provide a connection between generations.

President Museveni used the occasion to call for greater protection of indigenous languages, cultural practices and indigenous knowledge. He argued that local languages contain concepts and expressions that may not always be fully captured when translated into English and urged cultural institutions to work with government to preserve them. He also highlighted indigenous science and traditional knowledge, citing the preservation of Ankole long-horned cattle as an example of heritage that can carry ecological, economic and cultural value. His wider message was that cultural heritage should not be treated merely as something belonging to the past, but as knowledge and identity capable of contributing to contemporary society.

The cultural significance of Tooro also intersects with Uganda’s rapidly expanding tourism economy. Uganda recorded 1,371,895 international tourist arrivals in 2024, an increase of 7.7 percent from 2023. Tourism earnings reached approximately US$1.28 billion, while the sector continued to recover strongly following the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities subsequently reported that international arrivals rose further to 1.642 million in 2025, while tourism earnings reached UGX 5.83 trillion (US$1.62 billion). Domestic tourism participation was reported at 3.27 million Ugandans, demonstrating the increasing importance of tourism to Uganda’s economy and domestic cultural engagement.

Within this broader tourism landscape, western Uganda offers a distinctive combination of cultural and natural heritage. Tooro’s royal traditions are situated within a landscape associated with the Rwenzori Mountains, Kibale’s primate forests, Semuliki’s ecological diversity and Fort Portal’s cultural and historical identity. This creates an opportunity to connect cultural heritage, nature-based tourism, community enterprise and destination marketing rather than treating them as separate sectors.

The kingdom’s traditions can therefore contribute not only to cultural identity but also to intergenerational learning, creative industries, hospitality, crafts, gastronomy, heritage tourism and local enterprise.

President Museveni paid tribute to the late King Oyo, recalling their correspondence and acknowledging the contribution the late monarch made to Tooro and Uganda. He also congratulated Nyabongo I, recalling his earlier career as a news anchor and editor. “I was watching him on the news as a good news reader in English, so I am sure he will do a good job here,” the President said.

Museveni further used the occasion to argue that cultural institutions can complement the modern state by helping preserve indigenous languages, culture and knowledge. He particularly called upon cultural leaders to address family and marriage institutions and to promote responsible family life, while emphasising the importance of protecting indigenous knowledge, crafts and traditional practices.

In his maiden address as Omukama, Nyabongo I paid tribute to his predecessor and thanked the Babiito clan, the royal family, government and the people of Tooro for guiding the kingdom through the transition. He pledged an inclusive reign in which the kingdom would serve all people without discrimination while protecting the culture, traditions and ways of life of the Batooro. “We shall work together in unity, trusting that the Lord shall protect and bless the people of Tooro,” he said.

The new Omukama also pledged to work with religious leaders and elders to promote peace and wealth creation and encouraged the people of Tooro to work with the central government in advancing national development.

The transition also drew attention to the changing role of traditional institutions in contemporary Uganda. Minister of Gender, Labour and Social Development, Gen. Henry Tumukunde, said government recognised the contribution of the late King Oyo and welcomed the new royal couple.He emphasised the importance of maintaining clear institutional boundaries between cultural leadership and political authority while encouraging traditional institutions to strengthen their organisational capacity.

Minister of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities Hon. Tom Butime described the coronation as a historic occasion for Tooro and Uganda and commended the Batooro for maintaining unity during the transition.

The Omujwera Musuuga, Charles Kamurasi, also praised the people of Tooro for coming together to prepare for the coronation and formally handed authority to the new King.

As the afternoon progressed, Karuziika Palace became a theatre of cultural expression. Batooro in traditional mushana and busuuti filled the grounds. Royal drums that had remained silent during mourning once again reverberated through Fort Portal. Traditional dancers performed to the rhythm of amakondere, while ululations rose from the assembled crowds as the lion statues were unveiled. The imagery was unmistakable: mourning had given way to renewal.

For Tooro, the coronation was therefore more than the installation of a new monarch. It was a public reaffirmation of a cultural institution whose history stretches back generations and whose survival has depended on the transmission of language, memory, customs, knowledge and identity.

For Uganda, it offered another reminder that cultural heritage remains an important part of the country’s social fabric and, increasingly, an asset within the wider cultural and tourism economy. As Omukama Edward Rukidi Nyabongo I begins his reign, the challenge before the kingdom will be to carry the weight of its history while giving its heritage relevance to a new generation.

The royal drums have sounded again. A new reign has begun in Tooro, but the deeper story is one of continuity: a culture remembering where it came from while preparing for where it is going.

South Africa,  — The Government of the Republic of South Africa has approved the inclusion of holders of Ugandan passports in its Electronic Travel Authorisation (eTA) regime, according to a diplomatic communication from the High Commission of South Africa in Kampala to Uganda’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Under the new arrangement, Ugandan nationals holding valid passports may apply for an Electronic Travel Authorisation prior to travelling to South Africa.

Subject to approval of the eTA and compliance with applicable immigration and entry requirements, eligible travellers may be permitted to travel to and seek entry into South Africa for ordinary visits, including tourism, holidays and short-term business-related activities, in accordance with the conditions attached to the approved authorisation.

The South African High Commission has requested the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to bring the development to the attention of Government Ministries, Departments and Agencies, airlines operating in Uganda, relevant stakeholders and the general public.

The introduction of the eTA facility provides an additional digital mechanism through which eligible Ugandan travellers can obtain travel authorisation before departure, while maintaining South Africa’s applicable immigration and border-entry requirements.

Ugandan travellers intending to visit South Africa are advised to submit applications through the official Electronic Travel Authorisation platform of the Government of South Africa.

Official eTA application: South Africa Electronic Travel Authorisation (eTA)

For enquiries and technical assistance, applicants may contact:

The development comes as Uganda and South Africa continue to maintain longstanding diplomatic, political, economic and people-to-people relations. The facilitation of travel authorisation through a digital platform also has potential relevance for tourism, business engagement and other short-term exchanges between the two countries. The South African High Commission conveyed the information to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs through Ref. No. 17/1/8/UGA/V8, File No. DN 40/98.

Addis Ababa,— A delegation of Ugandan tourism stakeholders, led by Ms. Lilly Ajarova, Presidential Advisor for Tourism and Chief Executive Officer of the Uganda Tourism Board, has joined the Embassy of Uganda in Addis Ababa to showcase Destination Uganda at the Oromia Tourism Week (OTW) 2026.

The event, running from September 29 to October 1, 2026, at the Ethiopian Skylight Hotel, is being held under the theme “Digital Innovation for Inclusive Tourism.” Organised by the Oromia Tourism Commission under the Visit Oromia brand, OTW is a flagship tourism platform highlighting Oromia’s cultural heritage, natural attractions and tourism investment opportunities. It brings together tourism authorities, travel professionals, investors, businesses and visitors to promote sustainable tourism and strengthen the region’s position as a competitive destination.

The 2026 edition places particular emphasis on the growing role of digital innovation and artificial intelligence (AI) in tourism. According to figures cited during the event, AI could contribute between US$15.7 trillion and US$19.9 trillion to the global economy by 2030, while research indicates that 42 percent of travellers have already embraced or expressed interest in using AI in travel planning.

At the Uganda exhibition stall, Mr. Isa Kato, Vice President of the Uganda Tourism Association and Managing Director of Pristine Tours Ltd, described OTW as an important regional platform connecting international travel professionals, government representatives and investors. He said Uganda’s participation provides an opportunity to showcase the country’s tourism attractions, develop cross-border tourism partnerships and promote Ugandan value-added products across the wider Horn of Africa market.

The Ugandan delegation also attracted visitors through a virtual reality (VR) experience, demonstrating how digital immersion can enhance destination marketing and allow prospective travellers to experience attractions virtually before travelling.

Isaac Mulindwa, CEO of VAMOS – Africa Luxury Tours, observed that “digital immersion in marketing helps potential travellers make instant decisions.” He added that OTW goes beyond showcasing tourism assets by strengthening people-to-people connections and creating opportunities for investment and business partnerships.

Minister-Counsellor Margaret Kafeero, representing the Embassy of Uganda in Addis Ababa, welcomed the Uganda Tourism Association’s participation, describing the event as an important opportunity to market Uganda in Ethiopia, which she identified as a significant and largely untapped tourism market.

She noted that Ethiopia’s projected population of 138.9 million in 2026 presents considerable potential for expanding Uganda’s tourism outreach and strengthening people-to-people links between the two countries. “This is an opportunity of a lifetime,” she said.

Uganda’s participation in OTW 2026 underscores the country’s efforts to deepen regional tourism cooperation, embrace digital innovation and position the Pearl of Africa within emerging African travel markets.

The engagement also provides a platform for Ugandan tourism operators to connect with Ethiopian and international counterparts, explore new commercial partnerships and promote Uganda’s diverse tourism offering—from wildlife and primates to cultural heritage, adventure, nature and luxury experiences.

 

The debate over how the world is represented on a map has entered a new phase. Following the adoption by the United Nations General Assembly of the “Correct the Map” resolution, the three cartographers behind the Equal Earth projection Tom Patterson, Bernhard Jenny and Bojan Šavrič have agreed to provide scientific and technical support to Togo and the African Union as the initiative moves from advocacy to implementation.

The commitment was announced following a virtual meeting on 20 September 2026 convened at the initiative of Professor Robert Dussey, Togo’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, who championed the initiative at the United Nations on behalf of the African Group. The General Assembly adopted the resolution on 4 September by 164 votes in favour, with one vote against and six abstentions. The development gives a scientific dimension to what has become an important African diplomatic initiative: ensuring that the physical size of the world’s regions is represented more accurately in maps used for education, public communication and international affairs.

Equal Earth was developed in 2018 by Patterson, Jenny and Šavrič as an equal-area world map projection designed to preserve the relative size of land areas while maintaining a recognisable appearance of the continents. Its significance lies partly in what it does what it does not claim to do.

No flat map can reproduce the Earth’s curved surface without some form of distortion. Different projections therefore make different compromises involving area, shape, distance or direction. Equal Earth was specifically designed to prioritise the accurate representation of relative land area.

The projection was published in the International Journal of Geographical Information Science in 2018 and subsequently found applications in mapping and scientific contexts, including NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies and Esri software.

Its relevance to the African initiative is straightforward: Africa’s enormous geographic area is visually understated in commonly encountered world maps based on projections designed for other purposes, particularly the Mercator projection. The African Union has subsequently supported Equal Earth as an institutional cartographic reference, giving the projection a continental policy dimension.

The diplomatic breakthrough came on 4 September 2026, when the UN General Assembly adopted resolution A/RES/80/307, titled “Correct the map: rebalancing global cartographic representation and promoting equitable representation of the world’s regions, particularly Africa.” The initiative was introduced by Togo on behalf of the African Group and supported by the African Union. The adopted resolution encourages governments, schools, international organisations, publishers and technology companies to make greater use of equal-area projections where the relative size of territories is important.

Importantly, the resolution does not establish a universal ban on the Mercator projection, nor does it require every map to use Equal Earth. Different map projections serve different purposes. Mercator, for example, was developed principally for navigation and has properties that make it useful for that function. Equal Earth addresses a different cartographic priority: representing the relative area of continents and countries more faithfully. As the designers themselves have emphasised, there is no single projection that can eliminate every form of distortion. The UN initiative is therefore better understood as an effort to broaden cartographic choices and improve geographical literacy rather than simply replacing one map with another.

The decision by the Equal Earth designers to participate in the implementation phase creates an unusual bridge between scientific expertise and multilateral diplomacy. During the 20 September meeting, discussions reportedly focused on three principal areas of cooperation: providing scientific and technical assistance to governments and institutions adopting equal-area projections; developing freely usable reference maps; and preparing educational resources for African school systems. These priorities shift the initiative from symbolism to practical implementation.

A resolution adopted in New York can establish international encouragement. But changing the maps used in classrooms, textbooks, digital platforms and institutional publications requires technical standards, accessible materials, teacher resources and sustained coordination. That is where the involvement of the projection’s original designers becomes particularly significant.

The most consequential element of the initiative may ultimately be educational. For generations, students around the world have encountered maps as seemingly objective representations of geographic reality. Yet every world map is a projection of a three-dimensional planet onto a two-dimensional surface. Choices about what to preserve inevitably affect what viewers perceive.

The African initiative places this cartographic literacy within a broader question of how young people understand their continent and its place in the world. Professor Dussey described the educational dimension in terms of “cognitive justice,” arguing that how children learn to locate and visualise their continent can influence how they perceive the world.

The proposed cooperation therefore goes beyond printing new maps. It raises the possibility of developing teaching materials that explain why maps differ, what each projection is designed to achieve, and why no two-dimensional representation can perfectly reproduce the Earth. Such an approach would make the initiative educational rather than merely symbolic.

Togo is now expected to develop a concept note for a scientific advisory group that would provide a structured framework for the implementation process. The three Equal Earth designers have been invited to participate in their personal capacities.

A scientific advisory mechanism could help address some of the practical questions that arise from the resolution: which equal-area projections are appropriate for particular uses; how reference maps should be produced; how educational materials should be standardised; and how institutions can explain the limitations of different projections. It could also help preserve an important principle at the heart of the initiative: cartographic decisions should remain grounded in geographic science.

African diplomacy at the United Nations frequently focuses on questions of peace and security, development, climate change, trade, financing and reform of international institutions. “Correct the Map” introduces another dimension: the politics and science of representation. The African Union’s support and Togo’s diplomatic leadership demonstrate how a technical subject can become part of multilateral diplomacy when it intersects with questions of representation and international perception.

The initiative also illustrates how scientific work developed independently of political campaigning can later acquire international policy relevance. The Equal Earth designers did not originally create their projection as a diplomatic instrument. Its subsequent adoption and advocacy have given the work a new institutional context. That distinction is important because it allows the scientific contribution and the diplomatic objective to reinforce one another without confusing their respective roles.

Although Africa is central to the campaign, the UN resolution has a wider geographical scope. The underlying issue is not exclusively about Africa. It concerns how the relative size of all regions is communicated through maps and how institutions select projections according to their intended purpose. The resolution consequently encourages a broader conversation about geographical literacy and representation.

For schools, the implication may be particularly significant: students could encounter multiple projections and learn to understand the choices behind them rather than assuming that one world map represents the Earth without distortion.For digital platforms and international organisations, the discussion raises another practical question whether different cartographic projections should be selected according to the information a map is intended to communicate.

The adoption of the “Correct the Map” resolution was a diplomatic milestone. The next phase will be considerably more practical. Governments and institutions will have to determine whether and where to incorporate equal-area projections. Educational authorities will need appropriate materials. Cartographers and geospatial specialists will need to support implementation. Technology companies and publishers will have to consider how projection choices affect their products and audiences.

The proposed scientific advisory group could become an important mechanism for coordinating these efforts. The involvement of Patterson, Jenny and Šavrič provides an additional connection between the original scientific work and the international policy process now developing around it. For Africa, the significance extends beyond the appearance of a continent on a classroom wall.

It is about whether geographic representation can be made more scientifically accurate, whether students can be equipped to understand the limitations of maps, and whether international institutions can become more deliberate about the visual language through which the world is represented.

A map does not change the physical size of a continent but the choice of projection can change how that size is perceived. The next chapter of “Correct the Map” will therefore not be written primarily in a UN voting hall. It will be written in classrooms, atlases, digital platforms, government institutions and reference materials around the world.That is where a diplomatic resolution becomes practical knowledge—and where a cartographic debate can become part of how future generations understand the world.

The Public Diplomacy Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has bid farewell to Mr. Stilson Muhwezi, First Secretary, as he prepares to take up his new Tour of Duty at the Uganda Consulate in Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China.

The farewell gathering, held in Kampala, brought together colleagues from the Department to recognise Mr. Muhwezi’s contribution to public diplomacy, strategic communication and the broader work of the Ministry during his time in the Department.

Reflecting on his experience, Mr. Muhwezi expressed appreciation to his colleagues for their support, professional cooperation and teamwork throughout his service, particularly during demanding periods. He highlighted the lessons gained through his work in public diplomacy and expressed readiness to apply this experience to his new assignment in China. He also acknowledged the contribution of colleagues in delivering key departmental assignments, including the Diplomatic Notes Newsletter, noting that maintaining professional standards and delivering quality communication products requires collective commitment, coordination and teamwork.

Mrs. Anne Babinaga the Head of the Public Diplomacy Department,  commended Mr. Muhwezi for his contribution to the Department and encouraged him to carry forward the experience gained into his new assignment. Mrs. Babinaga emphasised that public diplomacy brings together several dimensions of international engagement, including strategic communication, cultural relations, economic and commercial diplomacy, and broader people-to-people relations. “The experience you have gained here is a strong foundation for your next assignment. The ability to bring different aspects of diplomacy together is an important skill that will continue to serve you wherever you are posted,” Mrs. Babinaga noted.

Colleagues also recognised Mr. Muhwezi’s commitment to teamwork, professional learning and the delivery of departmental assignments. They encouraged him to build on the knowledge and experience gained in the Public Diplomacy Department as he begins his new chapter in Guangzhou. His posting comes at a time when Uganda and China continue to strengthen bilateral relations across diplomatic, economic, commercial, cultural and people-to-people engagements.

As he embarks on his new Tour of Duty, the Public Diplomacy Department wished Mr. Muhwezi success and fulfilment in his assignment and expressed appreciation for his service, professionalism and contribution to the Department.

Kayunga, Uganda – 27 September 2026 — Two people have been killed and nine others injured following a road crash along the Kayunga–Jinja road, once again drawing attention to the human cost of road traffic crashes in Uganda and the wider road-safety challenge facing Africa.

The crash occurred at Seeta Nyize in Kangulumira Town Council, Kayunga District, when a Toyota Hiace taxi, registration number UAW 058J, reportedly collided with the rear of a Tata lorry, registration number UBR 835Y. According to Ssezibwa Region Police spokesperson SP Hellen Butoto, both vehicles were travelling from Kayunga towards Jinja when the collision occurred.

Two occupants Martin Mubiru and Fred Wanguwu, both residents of Nazigo in Kayunga District died in the crash. Nine people were injured, including Reagan Genga, Moses Kiiza, Jackson Ojambo, David Ibeli, Rukia Amoit, Manjeri Erumbi, Julius Kasubi and an unidentified baby, according to police information cited in the incident report.

The injured were taken to Kangulumira Health Centre IV, while one critically injured victim was transferred to Kayunga Regional Referral Hospital for further treatment. Police said the driver of the Toyota Hiace was among those killed, while the driver of the Tata lorry reportedly fled the scene and is being sought. The two vehicles were towed to Kangulumira Police Station for inspection as investigations continue.

Uganda’s Road Safety Challenge

The Kayunga crash is one incident within a much larger national road-safety challenge. According to the Uganda Police Force Annual Crime Report 2024, Uganda recorded 25,107 road traffic crashes in 2024, up from 23,608 in 2023—an increase of 6.4 percent. Of the crashes recorded in 2024, 4,434 were classified as fatal, 13,134 as serious and 7,539 as minor. Fatal crashes alone increased by 6.1 percent, from 4,179 in 2023 to 4,434 in 2024.

The figures show that Uganda’s road-safety challenge is not limited to isolated high-profile crashes. The number of reported crashes has been increasing, with the Police data showing a continuing burden of fatal and serious collisions.Uganda Police has previously noted that the burden of road traffic deaths falls heavily on pedestrians, boda boda riders and passengers, highlighting the particular vulnerability of people who have less physical protection in road crashes.

The issue extends well beyond Uganda, the World Health Organization estimates that approximately 1.19 million people die globally every year from road traffic crashes. Road traffic injuries are also identified as the leading cause of death among children and young people aged 5–29 years. More than half of road traffic fatalities globally occur among pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists.

The burden is particularly significant in low- and middle-income countries, where road users can face a combination of rapidly expanding vehicle fleets, vulnerable road users, infrastructure constraints and limited emergency-response capacity. WHO’s 2023 Global Status Report on Road Safety therefore places road safety within a broader public-health and development agenda.

For Uganda, WHO’s country data recorded a road traffic mortality rate of 16 deaths per 100,000 population in 2021, although WHO cautions that country-level mortality estimates have limitations where vital registration systems are incomplete.

The Kayunga incident also illustrates why road safety must be understood as more than a policing issue. A serious road crash affects families, health facilities, businesses, transport operators and local economies. A single collision can result in loss of household income, medical costs, permanent disability and long-term social consequences. This makes road safety relevant to Uganda’s wider development agenda, including public health, transport planning, urbanisation, emergency services, enforcement and economic productivity. For rapidly growing district centres and transport corridors such as Kayunga–Jinja, the challenge is particularly important as commercial activity and passenger movement increase.

Police investigations into the Kayunga crash will be expected to establish the circumstances surrounding the collision, including the factors that contributed to the vehicles colliding. The immediate priority remains supporting the injured, assisting affected families and establishing the facts. The broader lesson, however, is equally important: every road death represents more than a statistic.

Uganda’s official data show that thousands of road crashes are recorded every year, while the WHO’s global evidence demonstrates that road traffic injuries remain a major preventable cause of death among young people. Improving road safety therefore requires a shared effort involving drivers, passengers, pedestrians, transport operators, enforcement agencies, road authorities, health services and communities.

The objective is not simply to respond after a crash. It is to build a transport system in which reaching one’s destination does not carry an unacceptable risk to life. From Kayunga to the wider African road network, road safety is ultimately a question of protecting people and protecting the continent’s human capital.

 

Hoima, Uganda — Kabalega International Airport has begun receiving passenger flights, marking an important step in Uganda’s efforts to connect the oil-producing region more directly with the rest of Uganda and the wider African economy.

The arrival of a Uganda Airlines Bombardier CRJ900 carrying CAF, FIFA and AFCON Local Organising Committee officials provides a particularly powerful symbol of what the airport is being positioned to support: energy, sport, tourism, trade and regional mobility converging around Hoima.

The development comes as Uganda prepares for two major milestones—its first oil production and the co-hosting of the 2027 Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) with Kenya and Tanzania. AFCON 2027 is scheduled to begin on 19 June 2027, bringing one of Africa’s biggest sporting events to East Africa. Kabalega International Airport is being developed as a critical piece of the infrastructure supporting Hoima and the wider Bunyoro region.

Government has allocated Shs183.7 billion for the airport’s passenger terminal and related operationalisation, with the objective of opening the facility to commercial passenger traffic ahead of AFCON 2027. The airport is strategically located close to Hoima City Stadium, one of the venues being prepared for the continental tournament. Government has also been investing heavily in roads, accommodation and other infrastructure around Hoima and Masindi.

The convergence is significant.

  • An airport brings people.
  • A stadium brings audiences.
  • Oil brings investment.

Tourism brings visitors and connectivity allows all four to interact.

For Africa, the development represents a broader question about how major infrastructure can transform regions beyond traditional capitals. Hoima is emerging as an important node in Uganda’s western economic landscape, while the airport has the potential to connect Bunyoro more efficiently with other African markets and international destinations.

Uganda’s oil sector is expected to create demand for aviation, logistics, accommodation, professional services, construction, food supply chains and other supporting industries. At the same time, AFCON 2027 will bring football teams, officials, media, supporters and commercial activity into the region. That creates an opportunity for sporting infrastructure to become economic infrastructure.

Uganda is now approximately nine months from the opening of AFCON 2027. The Local Organising Committee says the country is targeting completion of its three competition stadiums by the end of December 2026, while CAF continues to assess infrastructure and operational readiness.

Recent CAF engagements have also highlighted the importance of accommodation, visas and upcountry infrastructure, underscoring that hosting a continental tournament requires much more than stadiums. This is where Kabalega International Airport becomes strategically important. The question is no longer simply whether aircraft can land. The bigger question is what economic ecosystem will grow around every landing.

  • Will local farmers supply hotels?
  • Will young people find new skills and employment?
  • Will tourism operators package Bunyoro for African and international visitors?
  • Will local manufacturers and service providers enter the supply chains?
  • Will the airport become a genuine commercial gateway rather than an event-driven facility?

Those are the questions that will determine the airport’s long-term legacy.

The arrival of passenger flights should therefore be viewed as the beginning of a longer journey. AFCON 2027 can provide the immediate catalyst. Oil can provide a major economic anchor. But the enduring objective should be to build a connected, productive and investment-ready Bunyoro whose infrastructure continues generating value long after the final whistle of the tournament.

Kabalega International Airport could ultimately become more than a transport facility. It could become a gateway through which Bunyoro connects its people, resources, businesses and opportunities to Uganda, East Africa and the wider African market and as the first passenger aircraft touches down, that future is no longer only being planned on paper—it is beginning to take flight.

 

 

A person can die, but what they have done can outlive their life. That is perhaps the most enduring way to remember Moses Matovu, the legendary musician, saxophonist, composer and longtime leader of Afrigo Band, who died on September 24, 2026, at the age of 77. His death has brought grief to Uganda’s music fraternity and to generations of people who encountered his music not simply as entertainment, but as part of the soundtrack of their lives. Yet, as Uganda mourns, there is a larger story worth remembering. It is the story of a man whose cultural contribution crossed generations, communities and social boundaries.

For more than five decades, Moses Matovu helped carry Ugandan live music through changing political, social and technological landscapes. Afrigo Band, which emerged in the mid-1970s, became one of the country’s longest-running musical institutions, reaching its 50th anniversary in 2025. Matovu remained central to that journey as vocalist, instrumentalist, composer, arranger and bandleader. That longevity is not merely a musical achievement. It is a cultural achievement.

Diplomacy is often associated with ambassadors, treaties, official visits and negotiating tables. But nations also communicate through culture. Musicians, artists, writers and filmmakers can carry a country’s identity across borders in ways that formal diplomacy sometimes cannot.

Moses Matovu was one of those cultural ambassadors, through Afrigo Band, Ugandan rhythms, melodies and stories travelled beyond the conventional boundaries of diplomacy. His work helped demonstrate that Uganda’s international identity is not defined only by political institutions or economic statistics, but also by its creativity, heritage and cultural memory. That is why his legacy belongs not only to the entertainment industry. It belongs to Uganda’s broader cultural history.

There is another dimension of Matovu’s life that has emerged with particular poignancy following his death. Many people who knew his music may not have known that he was Muslim. His funeral prayers were held at Kibuli Mosque before his body was taken to the National Theatre and later to Kyanja for burial. Perhaps that tells us something important about the man.

His faith did not need to become a public identity competing with his art. His music brought people together without requiring them to first ask who he was, what faith he followed or which community he belonged to. In death, that dimension of his identity has become another reminder of Uganda’s plural cultural character. A Muslim musician could become a national cultural figure whose work was embraced across religious and social communities. That, too, is a form of cultural diplomacy.

Matovu’s greatest achievement may not have been any individual performance or song.

It may have been continuity, He remained with Afrigo through generations of musicians and audiences, helping nurture younger talent and sustaining a band whose history became intertwined with Uganda’s own musical evolution. Afrigo’s survival for half a century speaks to more than individual talent; it speaks to discipline, mentorship, institutional memory and an understanding that culture must be handed from one generation to another. That is the lesson cultural institutions everywhere can learn from his life. Talent can create a moment.

At Daily Thinkers, where we believe that journalism should preserve context, memory and meaning beyond the day’s headlines, we remember Moses Matovu not simply because he was famous, but because he contributed something that cannot easily be measured.

He helped give Uganda a sound.

He helped preserve a generation.

He helped introduce younger musicians to a tradition that might otherwise have disappeared and he demonstrated that culture can remain relevant without abandoning its roots.

On behalf of Shanix Marketing and Media Agency, and personally, I extend my deepest condolences to the family of Moses Matovu, his colleagues at Afrigo Band, the Ugandan music fraternity and all those whose lives were touched by his music. His saxophone may have fallen silent but the music continues and perhaps that is the greatest tribute a musician can receive. Moses Matovu is gone. The legacy remains. The music remains. Uganda remembers.

May his soul rest in eternal peace.

 

The United Arab Emirates’ decision to ease the precautionary entry measures imposed on Ugandan nationals marks an important moment for Uganda’s international connectivity and economic diplomacy.

The measures were introduced on 6 June 2026 amid concerns linked to the Ebola outbreak and included suspension of new visas and restrictions on entry. On 26 September, the UAE announced that the measures affecting Uganda would be eased following Uganda’s successful completion of the required monitoring period and the official declaration that the country was Ebola-free.  The timing is significant because the disruption came just as Uganda’s international tourism, aviation and investment sectors were showing strong momentum.

Uganda entered 2026 from a relatively strong tourism position. In 2025, international tourist arrivals increased 19.7 percent to 1.64 million, while tourism receipts reached approximately US$1.62 billion (Shs5.83 trillion) a 21.3 percent increase over the previous year. The 2025 arrival figure was also about 106 percent of the 2019 pre-pandemic level.  The impact of the subsequent travel disruptions can be seen particularly clearly through aviation statistics. Entebbe International Airport handled:

Period International passengers Year-on-year position
June 2026 131,246 70,514 fewer than June 2025
July 2026 156,342 70,667 fewer than July 2025
August 2026 169,706 69,623 fewer than August 2025

Across those three months, Entebbe recorded 210,804 fewer international passenger movements than in the corresponding months of 2025. August alone was 29.1 percent below August 2025, despite July–August normally being a peak travel period. Uganda Civil Aviation Authority attributed the decline in part to recent travel restrictions.

These figures should not be described as US-dollar economic losses, because passenger movements are not equivalent to tourism expenditure or trade value. They are better understood as an indicator of the scale of lost international connectivity and economic activity during the disruption. The effect has also been felt directly by businesses. In August, Daily Monitor reported the case of a Ugandan tour operator who lost a school-group booking worth approximately US$5,000 after the clients postponed their Uganda trip because of health concerns.

The UAE is not simply another destination in Uganda’s international network. It has become an increasingly important commercial, investment and logistical partner. Uganda’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs reported that bilateral trade with the UAE had reached US$2.85 billion by September 2025, while UAE investment in Uganda was estimated at approximately US$3.5 billion across sectors including energy, infrastructure, agribusiness, oil and gas, manufacturing, real estate and tourism.

More recent preparations for the 5th Uganda–UAE Business Forum cite bilateral trade of approximately US$4.7 billion in 2025, compared with about US$2.7 billion in 2024 and US$600 million in 2018. UAE foreign direct investment in Uganda was estimated at about US$3.5 billion in 2025.  These figures demonstrate why restoring smooth movement between the two countries matters beyond passenger travel. Connectivity supports business travel, tourism, investment missions, cargo, market access, remittances, education, professional mobility and investor confidence.

The UAE’s easing of measures comes at a particularly important point in Uganda’s economic diplomacy calendar. The 5th Uganda–UAE Business Forum, scheduled for 26–29 October 2026 across Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Sharjah and Fujairah, is intended to connect Ugandan businesses with UAE investors, buyers, financial institutions and strategic partners. Its priority sectors include agriculture and agro-processing, trade and exports, mining and minerals, tourism, infrastructure, energy, logistics and air cargo, manufacturing, financial services and technology.

The easing of the entry measures therefore creates an opportunity to move the conversation from restriction and recovery to confidence and commercial renewal. But reopening alone will not recover opportunities that may have been deferred during the disruption. Uganda now needs to use the period before the forum to reassure markets, reconnect buyers and investors, restore travel confidence, communicate the country’s health preparedness, and ensure that Ugandan companies arrive in the UAE with concrete products, investment propositions and export-ready opportunities.

The Ministry of Health declared Uganda Ebola-free on 28 July 2026, following completion of the required 42-day monitoring period without new cases. The UAE’s subsequent decision reflects that public-health assessment.

The immediate task is therefore not simply to celebrate the lifting of a precautionary measure. It is to convert restored access into restored economic activity. For Uganda, that means presenting a clear message to the UAE and wider global market: Uganda is open, its public-health surveillance systems have demonstrated resilience, and its economic opportunities remain available. For the upcoming business forum, this creates an opportunity to address three questions directly:

  • What was interrupted? International mobility, tourism bookings, business travel and some commercial activity.
  • What must be restored? Confidence, connectivity, market access and business relationships.
  • What should come next? New investment, stronger exports, tourism recovery, air-cargo growth, technology partnerships and measurable commercial agreements.

The real measure of the next phase of Uganda–UAE economic diplomacy should therefore extend beyond meetings and declarations. It should be reflected in contracts signed, investment mobilised, exports generated, tourists returning, businesses connected and jobs created the very outcomes organisers of the 2026 forum have identified as measures of success.

The easing of UAE entry measures is therefore more than a travel development. It is a timely opportunity to reopen a corridor of confidence between Uganda and one of its increasingly important economic partners and to enter the October business forum with recovery translated into opportunity.

Kampala, Uganda –Uganda’s National Social Security Fund (NSSF) has declared a 22.53 per cent interest rate for members for the financial year 2025/26, the highest rate announced in the Fund’s 40-year history. The declaration places renewed attention on a question extending beyond retirement savings: how Uganda can increasingly use its growing pool of domestic institutional capital to support economic transformation while safeguarding the interests of savers.

The rate, announced by Minister of Finance, Planning and Economic Development Henry Musasizi at NSSF’s 14th Annual Members’ Meeting, will see approximately Shs5.44 trillion credited to members’ accounts. This compares with an interest allocation of about Shs2.5 trillion associated with the 13.5 per cent rate declared for 2024/25.

The scale of the latest distribution reflects the expansion of NSSF itself. The Fund reported strong growth in income during the financial year, while assets under management increased from approximately Shs26 trillion to Shs32 trillion. Member contributions also continued to rise, demonstrating the growing volume of long-term savings being mobilised through the formal social security system.

For Uganda, the significance of this growth extends beyond the balance sheets of individual savers. A large pension fund creates a substantial pool of patient capital that can potentially participate in government securities, equities, infrastructure, private enterprise and other long-term investments.

NSSF reported investing approximately Shs4.32 trillion in Uganda’s economy during the financial year. Government securities accounted for about 76 per cent of this investment, while approximately 18 per cent was invested in equities, including listed companies.

The investment pattern illustrates the dual role of a large pension institution. NSSF must generate competitive and sustainable returns for members, while its investment activities also have wider effects on the availability of capital within the economy. This is where the development question becomes important.

Uganda requires substantial long-term financing for infrastructure, industrialisation, agriculture, housing, energy and private-sector development. Domestic institutional investors can potentially complement government revenues, commercial bank lending and external development financing.

However, pension assets are ultimately members’ savings. Their deployment therefore has to remain consistent with the Fund’s legal mandate, investment rules and responsibility to generate appropriate returns.

The issue is consequently not whether NSSF should simply invest more in development projects, but which investments can simultaneously meet sound financial requirements and contribute to Uganda’s productive capacity.

The discussion at the annual meeting pointed to major infrastructure projects, including the proposed Kampala–Jinja Expressway, as potential areas for NSSF participation. Such projects illustrate the potential connection between pension capital and national infrastructure development. Where commercially viable structures exist, institutional investors can provide long-term financing that complements public resources.

NSSF Board Chairman David Ogong, however, noted that the Fund’s investment activities remain subject to the legal framework governing its operations. This is significant because the availability of capital does not by itself determine where pension funds can be invested.

For policymakers, the challenge is therefore to create investment structures in which commercially sound projects can attract institutional capital without converting pension savings into instruments of policy financing that expose members to inappropriate risks.

NSSF’s role is also becoming increasingly regional. The Fund has invested more than Shs10 trillion in Kenya, Tanzania and Rwanda as part of its diversification strategy. This gives the Fund an additional relevance to Uganda’s economic and commercial diplomacy.

Regional integration is often discussed in terms of trade, customs, infrastructure and movement of people. Yet capital is another important component of regional economic integration. When Ugandan institutional investors participate in neighbouring markets, they become part of the financial architecture supporting the wider East African economy. Such investments can also provide portfolio diversification while exposing Ugandan institutional capital to businesses and financial markets beyond the domestic economy.

The regional dimension therefore presents an intersection between investment strategy and economic diplomacy: Uganda’s institutions are not only seeking opportunities abroad but are also participating in the development of interconnected East African markets.

The Fund’s long-term strategy gives this trend an even larger potential scale. NSSF currently has approximately 3.6 million registered members, with about 2.7 million having balances. During the first year of its new strategy, the Fund targeted 300,000 new savers and reported enrolling approximately 311,000.

Its longer-term ambition is to reach 15 million savers and grow assets to Shs80 trillion by 2035, after revising an earlier Shs50 trillion target. If achieved, such growth would substantially expand Uganda’s domestic pool of long-term capital.

It would also make questions surrounding capital allocation increasingly important. The larger the Fund becomes, the greater the potential economic consequences of its investment decisions not only for individual savers but also for capital markets, government financing, infrastructure and private investment.

For Uganda’s economic diplomacy, NSSF provides an example of how domestic financial institutions can become part of a broader strategy for economic transformation. A stronger domestic savings base can reduce exclusive dependence on external sources of long-term finance. At the same time, regional investment allows Ugandan institutions to participate in markets across East Africa.

This does not mean that pension funds should replace foreign investment or development finance. Rather, domestic institutional capital can potentially work alongside these sources of financing, particularly where investment opportunities are structured around commercially viable projects. The growing size of NSSF also creates a platform for greater engagement between financial institutions, government agencies, businesses and Uganda’s economic missions abroad. Identifying viable investment opportunities, understanding regional markets and supporting Ugandan institutional investors are increasingly interconnected aspects of economic diplomacy.

The 22.53 per cent interest rate is therefore an important headline, but it is not the only measure of NSSF’s significance. The deeper issue is what happens as the Fund continues to grow. The immediate benefit is the higher amount credited to members. The longer-term significance lies in whether Uganda can build an investment ecosystem capable of converting growing domestic savings into productive capital while maintaining prudent risk management and sustainable returns.

With assets of approximately Shs32 trillion, millions of members and an expanding regional investment portfolio, NSSF occupies an increasingly important position within Uganda’s financial and economic architecture. Its next phase will consequently be measured not only by the size of annual interest declarations, but also by the quality of the capital allocation decisions behind them how effectively pension savings are protected, diversified and channelled into investments capable of generating lasting economic value.

For Uganda’s economic diplomacy, the emerging opportunity is clear in structural terms: a growing domestic savings base can become an important source of long-term capital for Uganda and the wider East African economy, provided that development objectives and the fiduciary interests of savers remain properly aligned.

Kampala,— Uganda and the European Union marked five decades of partnership with a special photographic exhibition at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Headquarters in Kampala, using the stories of Ugandans to reflect on the evolution of a relationship that has expanded from development cooperation into trade, investment, education, climate action, security and humanitarian cooperation.

Held under the theme “Together, Tukola, Built by Uganda, Backed by the European Union,” the exhibition brought together Government representatives, the European Union Delegation and Heads of Mission from EU Member States. The exhibition featured 12 Ugandan “icons” whose experiences illustrated the human dimension of the partnership, including entrepreneurs, farmers, health workers, creatives, engineers and refugees.

Representing the Government of Uganda, the Minister of State for Foreign Affairs in charge of Regional Cooperation, Hon. Haruna Kyeyune Kasolo, described the anniversary as an opportunity to reflect on the evolution of the relationship and its future direction. “For 50 years, the Uganda-EU partnership has been part of Uganda’s development story. From rebuilding infrastructure and expanding essential services to supporting education, livelihoods, innovation and sustainable growth, this cooperation has touched the lives of many Ugandans across generations,” Hon. Kasolo said.

The partnership dates back to May 1976, when the European Community opened its delegation in Kampala. At the time, the European Community had nine member states; today, the European Union comprises 27 Member States. Over the intervening five decades, the relationship has expanded considerably. According to the EU Delegation, the EU and its Member States, working as Team Europe, have provided more than €5 billion in development support to Uganda over the past five decades, alongside substantial European private investment.

The economic relationship has also become increasingly significant. EU trade data show that in 2024, EU imports from Uganda were valued at €1.077 billion, while EU exports to Uganda stood at €739 million, bringing total merchandise trade to approximately €1.82 billion. EU imports from Uganda were dominated by agricultural products, which accounted for about €1 billion, highlighting the importance of agriculture and value addition to Uganda’s commercial engagement with the European market.

The shift towards a more commercially oriented relationship was also highlighted by Mr. Vincent Waiswa Bagiire, Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, who noted that the partnership was entering a phase in which trade and investment would play a greater role alongside established development cooperation. The transition, he observed, provided an opportunity to build on previous achievements while aligning cooperation more closely with Uganda’s long-term economic priorities.

EU Ambassador to Uganda H.E. Jan Sadek said the photographic exhibition was intended to place people at the centre of the Golden Jubilee story. “A partnership is ultimately measured not only in years, but in lives changed. These twelve stories remind us that behind every programme, investment or policy, there are Ugandans whose determination, talent and enterprise are helping shape the country’s future,” Ambassador Sadek said.

The exhibition reflected cooperation across renewable energy, education, health, gender equality, human rights, agriculture, infrastructure, environmental conservation and the creative economy. Earlier in 2026, Ambassador Sadek noted that the partnership had evolved into a broad relationship encompassing trade and investment, energy and climate action, education and health, humanitarian support and regional stability.

Looking towards the next 50 years, Hon. Kasolo emphasised the importance of cooperation that responds to Uganda’s changing economic priorities. He highlighted climate finance, value-added trade, education, innovation and stronger connections between universities and enterprises as areas for deeper engagement. He also pointed to opportunities in infrastructure and energy, health and education, agricultural processing, construction and services, while emphasising the importance of increasing the value of Ugandan exports through improved certification, storage, post-harvest systems, engineering and processing.

Agriculture remains central to this agenda. Coffee, fish, flowers and fruits are among Uganda’s export interests in European markets, while the scale of EU imports from Uganda in 2024 demonstrated the continuing importance of agricultural commodities in the relationship.

The partnership also carries an important humanitarian dimension. Uganda hosts more than two million refugees and has continued to work with international partners on refugee protection, livelihoods and social and economic inclusion. The Golden Jubilee exhibition therefore presented the Uganda-EU relationship not simply as a record of five decades of official cooperation, but as an evolving partnership expressed through institutions, businesses, communities and individual lives.

As Uganda and the European Union look beyond the 50-year milestone, the emphasis is increasingly on converting established cooperation into expanded trade, investment, skills, innovation and sustainable economic opportunities, while preserving the dialogue and institutional relationships that have sustained the partnership since 1976.

 

New York,— Uganda has reaffirmed its commitment to advancing legal equality for women and girls, calling for stronger implementation of laws and institutions to ensure that formal legal protections translate into meaningful rights and opportunities across communities.

Uganda’s position was presented on 23 September at a high-level side event convened by UN Women at United Nations Headquarters in New York, on the margins of the 81st Session of the United Nations General Assembly. The discussion brought together governments, United Nations entities, civil society organisations and advocates around the continuing challenge of discriminatory laws affecting women and girls.

Representing the Government of Uganda, Ambassador Rebecca Amuge Otengo, Uganda’s Permanent Representative to the African Union, spoke on behalf of the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Adonia Ayebare. She highlighted Uganda’s constitutional guarantees and recent legislative reforms while emphasising that the effectiveness of legal equality ultimately depends on implementation, institutional capacity and access to justice.

One of the reforms highlighted was Uganda’s Succession (Amendment) Act, 2022, which amended succession law to bring it into conformity with the Constitution and to strengthen gender equality in succession and inheritance. The legislation also provides for protection of principal residential property for surviving spouses and lineal descendants and removes discriminatory elements relating to customary heirs and heiresses.

The reform has particular significance for women’s economic security. UN Women’s country-level legal database notes that the amended succession framework expanded property-distribution provisions to both male and female dependants and spouses and refined the definition of customary heir or heiress to remove discrimination. Yet Uganda’s intervention placed equal emphasis on the distance that can exist between legislation and lived experience.

Amb. Otengo stressed the importance of ensuring that legal reforms are supported by accessible institutions, effective enforcement, public awareness, adequate financing and survivor-centred approaches to justice. The emphasis reflects a broader recognition that the passage of legislation is only one stage in achieving equality: rights must also be understood, accessible and enforceable.

This implementation dimension is particularly relevant to Africa, where questions of legal equality intersect with access to land and property, citizenship and nationality, political participation, justice systems and the economic position of women and girls.

Uganda therefore identified three areas requiring accelerated attention.

The first is the reform of discriminatory laws and the closing of the gap between legal provisions and their practical application. This includes strengthening institutions responsible for enforcement, ensuring adequate financing and developing accountability mechanisms capable of measuring whether legal protections are reaching intended beneficiaries.

The second is meaningful participation by women in the institutions responsible for making and enforcing laws. Uganda emphasised that women’s participation should extend beyond minimum numerical representation to substantive involvement in shaping legislation, public policy and justice systems.

The third is ensuring that legal equality reaches women who can face additional structural barriers, including women affected by conflict, women with disabilities and women living in rural and underserved communities.

The discussion also placed legal equality within the wider development agenda. Equal access to citizenship, property, inheritance and justice affects women’s ability to participate fully in economic and public life and therefore has implications beyond the legal sector.

For Africa, this connection between rights, institutions and development is particularly important as the continent advances regional commitments on women’s empowerment, inclusive governance and sustainable development.

Uganda’s intervention consequently framed legal equality not simply as a question of legislative drafting but as an institutional and societal responsibility. The objective is to ensure that constitutional guarantees and statutory reforms are reflected in the everyday experiences of women and girls.

The country’s position also underscores the importance of women’s leadership in sustaining legal and institutional reform. Women must not only be beneficiaries of legal protection but active participants in lawmaking, implementation, oversight and accountability.

As the international community works towards 2030, Uganda’s message from New York was that progress should be measured not only by the number of laws enacted, but by whether those laws are accessible, understood and enforced. The broader challenge for Africa is therefore one of implementation: converting commitments to equality into institutions that work, rights that can be exercised and justice that can be reached.

Uganda’s contribution placed that implementation challenge at the centre of its engagement, linking legal equality with equal citizenship, inclusive development and stronger institutions across the continent.

New York,— Uganda has called for stronger regional cooperation, coordinated border governance and sustainable support for African-led peace and security mechanisms as African states confront terrorism and violent extremism that increasingly operate across national boundaries.

Uganda made the call during the 1369th Ministerial Meeting of the African Union Peace and Security Council, held in New York on 23 September 2026 on the margins of the 81st Session of the United Nations General Assembly. The meeting considered the theme “Good Neighbourliness and Regional Responses to Security and Terrorism Challenges in Africa.”

The African Union has confirmed that the session focused on strengthening African cooperation against security threats that transcend national borders, with particular attention to good neighbourliness, intelligence-sharing, early warning, border governance, terrorist financing and cooperation among Member States, Regional Economic Communities and Regional Mechanisms.

Representing Uganda, Ambassador Rebecca Amuge Otengo, Uganda’s Permanent Representative to the African Union and the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, stressed that terrorism and violent extremism require responses that extend beyond individual national jurisdictions. “Terrorism and violent extremism do not respect borders,” Ambassador Otengo said, pointing to the exploitation of ungoverned spaces, local grievances, weak border controls, illicit financial flows and transnational criminal networks.

Uganda’s intervention placed good neighbourliness at the centre of the continental security response. In this context, good neighbourliness was presented not simply as a diplomatic principle but as a practical requirement for security cooperation among states sharing borders and facing common threats.

The approach is consistent with the wider AU discussion surrounding the 1369th PSC meeting. The African Union has emphasised that borders are simultaneously spaces of state sovereignty and areas where communities live, trade and maintain social and cultural connections. The AU has therefore called for stronger cooperation among neighbouring states while strengthening existing continental frameworks rather than creating parallel mechanisms.

Uganda called for enhanced intelligence-sharing, joint threat assessments and closer cooperation among security and law-enforcement agencies. It also advocated stronger support for the African Union Counter-Terrorism Centre to improve coordination, intelligence fusion and institutional capacity.

Border governance formed another important part of Uganda’s position. The delegation called for strengthened implementation of the African Union Border Programme and the Niamey Convention on Cross-Border Cooperation, while emphasising the importance of involving border communities in preventing insecurity.

The argument is that border security cannot be separated from the economic and social conditions of border populations. Investment in public services, livelihoods and legitimate cross-border trade can complement security measures and help transform border areas into spaces of economic interaction and cooperation.

Uganda also placed emphasis on the operational capacity of African peace and security institutions. It called for the African Standby Force and its regional components to develop the capabilities required for timely deployment, including sustainable logistics and predictable financing, while operating consistently with Member States’ sovereignty and international law.

Financing remains a central issue in the wider AU-UN peace and security partnership. UN Security Council Resolution 2719, adopted unanimously on 21 December 2023, established a framework under which African Union-led peace support operations authorised by the Security Council may access UN assessed contributions, subject to the conditions and arrangements set out in the resolution.

The UN has subsequently worked with the AU on operationalising that framework, including joint planning and decision-making, mission support, financing and budgeting, as well as human-rights compliance and protection of civilians.

Uganda’s intervention also connected security policy with the underlying conditions that can contribute to instability. The delegation identified exclusion, youth unemployment, radicalisation, disinformation, arms trafficking and terrorism financing among issues requiring attention alongside security operations.

Women, young people, traditional leaders, civil society and the private sector were identified as important participants in prevention, community resilience and efforts to address vulnerabilities that armed and terrorist groups can exploit.

Another priority was stronger institutional coordination. Uganda called for clearer cooperation among the African Union, Regional Economic Communities and Regional Mechanisms in order to reduce duplication and establish clearer responsibilities in responding to transnational threats.

The emphasis on coordination reflects the increasingly cross-border character of terrorism and organised crime. The AU’s own deliberations have highlighted the need for intelligence-sharing, harmonised legal frameworks, early warning and stronger action against terrorist financing.

Uganda’s position therefore linked continental security to regional integration. The argument is that effective cooperation against terrorism requires neighbouring states to maintain channels of communication even when political differences exist, while ensuring that national sovereignty and territorial integrity remain respected.

The wider international dimension is equally important. African-led security responses increasingly operate within a partnership involving the African Union, Regional Economic Communities, the United Nations and other international partners. Resolution 2719 provides one part of the emerging institutional framework for that partnership, while the AU continues to develop its own continental peace and security capabilities.

For Uganda, the central message from New York was therefore one of shared responsibility: terrorism cannot be addressed through isolated national measures when threats, financing networks, recruitment patterns and criminal activity cross borders. “Africa’s borders must not divide our security efforts,” Ambassador Otengo said, underscoring Uganda’s call for trust, coordinated action and stronger regional institutions.

Uganda’s contribution to the 1369th PSC Ministerial Meeting placed good neighbourliness, regional cooperation, effective continental institutions and sustainable financing within the broader African and international peace and security agenda. The challenge now lies in translating these principles into sustained cooperation on the ground: stronger intelligence networks, effective border governance, resilient communities, capable regional institutions and predictable support for African-led peace and security operations.

 

Kampala, Uganda — It is a cold morning in Uganda, and for a country accustomed to hearing the warm sounds of Afrigo Band across generations, the news of the death of Moses Matovu has brought an unusual silence.

Matovu, the veteran musician, saxophonist, vocalist, composer and longtime leader of Afrigo Band, died at Kibuli Hospital on Thursday morning after reportedly being attacked by unidentified assailants in Kampala. Reports indicate that he was attacked while on his way to a mosque for morning prayers and was subsequently rushed to hospital. The circumstances of the attack and the identities and motive of the assailants remain under investigation.

For Uganda’s cultural community, however, the significance of Matovu’s death extends far beyond the circumstances of his final hours. It marks the passing of one of the principal custodians of a musical tradition that has accompanied Uganda through decades of political, social and cultural change.

Born in Kampala in 1949, Matovu entered professional music in the 1960s, first performing with the Thunderbirds Band before moving through the Police Band and Cranes Band. In 1975, following the collapse of the Cranes Band, he and fellow musicians established Afrigo Band. What followed was one of the most enduring stories in Uganda’s popular music.

Afrigo reached its 50th anniversary in 2025, a milestone that reflected not merely the longevity of a musical group but the extraordinary ability of a cultural institution to remain relevant across generations. Under Matovu’s leadership, the band developed a distinctive sound drawing from African rumba, jazz, funk and local Ugandan musical traditions, with Luganda lyrics helping anchor its music in Ugandan cultural expression.

For generations of Ugandans, Afrigo was more than entertainment. It became part of the soundtrack of national life. Matovu’s saxophone and voice were therefore not simply instruments of performance. They were instruments of memory. This is where the loss of Moses Matovu acquires a broader significance for cultural diplomacy.

Countries do not communicate their identity to the world only through embassies, official statements and diplomatic meetings. They also speak through music, literature, film, food, fashion, sport and the creative arts.

Artists can become informal cultural ambassadors because they carry elements of their societies with them wherever they perform. Their work can introduce foreign audiences to a country’s language, rhythms, history, values and imagination without the need for a formal diplomatic message.

Afrigo embodied this dimension of Uganda’s international cultural presence. The band has performed for Ugandan communities in the diaspora, including audiences in Europe and the United States, helping maintain cultural connections between Ugandans abroad and the country of their heritage.

In 2016, Afrigo was also recognised by the Kabaka of Buganda for its contribution to the preservation of culture, with Matovu publicly associated with that recognition. Such moments demonstrate how cultural institutions can operate at the intersection of identity, heritage and international engagement.

Matovu’s greatest legacy may ultimately be found not in a single song or performance, but in the continuity he helped create. He remained active in music for decades while nurturing younger musicians and advocating for the preservation of culture. In a 2024 engagement with young learners, Matovu encouraged parents to recognise and nurture children’s creative abilities, describing culture as foundational to identity.

That message is particularly relevant at a time when Uganda’s creative industries are increasingly connected to digital platforms, international audiences and the wider African cultural economy. The death of a cultural figure of Matovu’s generation consequently raises an important question: how does a country preserve the knowledge carried by its cultural pioneers?

Recordings must be preserved. Oral histories must be documented. Musical archives must be digitised. Young artists must have opportunities to learn from those who built Uganda’s creative industries before them. And cultural institutions need the capacity to ensure that important artistic legacies do not disappear with their creators. Cultural diplomacy ultimately depends on cultural memory.

Uganda will mourn Moses Matovu as a musician, but history may remember him as something larger: a custodian of a particular chapter in Uganda’s cultural story.

Afrigo’s five-decade journey demonstrated that music can outlive political eras, technological changes and shifting public tastes. Its survival created a bridge between generations of Ugandans and provided a recognisable expression of Ugandan creativity to audiences beyond the country’s borders. His death therefore invites more than condolences. It invites reflection on how Uganda values, documents and projects its cultural heritage.

As the police investigation into the circumstances of his death continues, the country waits for answers. But alongside the search for justice is another responsibility: to ensure that the music, stories, recordings and lessons of Moses Matovu’s generation remain accessible to those who come after them.

On this cold September morning, Uganda has lost a musician but it has also lost a keeper of memory and somewhere beneath the grief, the question remains: who will carry the music forward?  Moses Matovu, may your soul rest in peace.